1. Aristotle, Rhetoric, None (4th cent. BCE - 4th cent. BCE) Tagged with subjects: •rule, baths of caracalla Found in books: Borg (2008), Paideia: the World of the Second Sophistic: The World of the Second Sophistic, 121 |
2. Dionysius of Halycarnassus, Commentaries On The Ancient Orators, 12 (1st cent. BCE - missingth cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •rule, baths of caracalla Found in books: Borg (2008), Paideia: the World of the Second Sophistic: The World of the Second Sophistic, 123 |
3. Quintilian, Institutes of Oratory, 3.4.12-3.4.16 (1st cent. CE - 1st cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •rule, baths of caracalla Found in books: Borg (2008), Paideia: the World of the Second Sophistic: The World of the Second Sophistic, 121 | 3.4.12. The safest and most rational course seems to be to follow the authority of the majority. There is, then, as I have said, one kind concerned with praise and blame, which, however, derives its name from the better of its two functions and is called laudatory; others however call it demonstrative. Both names are believed to be derived from the Greek in which the corresponding terms are encomiastic, and epideictic. 3.4.13. The term epideictic seems to me however to imply display rather than demonstration, and to have a very different meaning from encomiastic. For although it includes laudatory oratory, it does not confine itself thereto. 3.4.14. Will any one deny the title of epideictic to panegyric? But yet panegyrics are advisory in form and frequently discuss the interests of Greece. We may therefore conclude that, while there are three kinds of oratory, all three devote themselves in part to the matter at hand, and in part to display. But it may be that Romans are not borrowing from Greek when they apply the term demonstrative, but are merely led to do so because praise and blame demonstrate the nature of the object with which they are concerned. 3.4.15. The second kind is deliberative, the third forensic oratory. All other species fall under these three genera: you will not find one in which we have not to praise or blame, to advise or dissuade, to drive home or refute a charge, while conciliation, narration, proof, exaggeration, extenuation, and the moulding of the minds of the audience by exciting or allaying their passions, are common to all three kinds of oratory. 3.4.16. I cannot even agree with those who hold that laudatory subjects are concerned with the question of what is honourable, deliberative with the question of what is expedient, and forensic with the question of what is just: the division thus made is easy and neat rather than true: for all three kinds rely on the mutual assistance of the other. For we deal with justice and expediency in panegyric and with honour in deliberations, while you will rarely find a forensic case, in part of which at any rate something of those questions just mentioned is not to be found. |
|
4. Quintilian, Institutio Oratoria, 3.4.12-3.4.16 (1st cent. CE - 1st cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •rule, baths of caracalla Found in books: Borg (2008), Paideia: the World of the Second Sophistic: The World of the Second Sophistic, 121 | 3.4.12. The safest and most rational course seems to be to follow the authority of the majority. There is, then, as I have said, one kind concerned with praise and blame, which, however, derives its name from the better of its two functions and is called laudatory; others however call it demonstrative. Both names are believed to be derived from the Greek in which the corresponding terms are encomiastic, and epideictic. 3.4.13. The term epideictic seems to me however to imply display rather than demonstration, and to have a very different meaning from encomiastic. For although it includes laudatory oratory, it does not confine itself thereto. 3.4.14. Will any one deny the title of epideictic to panegyric? But yet panegyrics are advisory in form and frequently discuss the interests of Greece. We may therefore conclude that, while there are three kinds of oratory, all three devote themselves in part to the matter at hand, and in part to display. But it may be that Romans are not borrowing from Greek when they apply the term demonstrative, but are merely led to do so because praise and blame demonstrate the nature of the object with which they are concerned. 3.4.15. The second kind is deliberative, the third forensic oratory. All other species fall under these three genera: you will not find one in which we have not to praise or blame, to advise or dissuade, to drive home or refute a charge, while conciliation, narration, proof, exaggeration, extenuation, and the moulding of the minds of the audience by exciting or allaying their passions, are common to all three kinds of oratory. 3.4.16. I cannot even agree with those who hold that laudatory subjects are concerned with the question of what is honourable, deliberative with the question of what is expedient, and forensic with the question of what is just: the division thus made is easy and neat rather than true: for all three kinds rely on the mutual assistance of the other. For we deal with justice and expediency in panegyric and with honour in deliberations, while you will rarely find a forensic case, in part of which at any rate something of those questions just mentioned is not to be found. |
|
5. Seneca The Younger, Dialogi, 9.4-9.7 (1st cent. CE - 1st cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •rule, baths of caracalla Found in books: Borg (2008), Paideia: the World of the Second Sophistic: The World of the Second Sophistic, 307 |
6. Pliny The Elder, Natural History, 36.33-36.34 (1st cent. CE - 1st cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •rule, baths of caracalla Found in books: Borg (2008), Paideia: the World of the Second Sophistic: The World of the Second Sophistic, 114 |
7. Plutarch, Moralia, None (1st cent. CE - 2nd cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •rule, baths of caracalla Found in books: Borg (2008), Paideia: the World of the Second Sophistic: The World of the Second Sophistic, 115 |
8. Apuleius, Apology, 14 (2nd cent. CE - 2nd cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •rule, baths of caracalla Found in books: Borg (2008), Paideia: the World of the Second Sophistic: The World of the Second Sophistic, 123 |
9. Apuleius, The Golden Ass, 1.13.4-1.13.6, 2.4, 2.4.10 (2nd cent. CE - 2nd cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •nan Found in books: Borg (2008), Paideia: the World of the Second Sophistic: The World of the Second Sophistic, 120 |
10. Achilles Tatius, The Adventures of Leucippe And Cleitophon, 3.8.1-3.8.2 (2nd cent. CE - 2nd cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •rule, baths of caracalla Found in books: Borg (2008), Paideia: the World of the Second Sophistic: The World of the Second Sophistic, 119, 120 |
11. Gellius, Attic Nights, 3.1 (2nd cent. CE - 2nd cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •rule, baths of caracalla Found in books: Borg (2008), Paideia: the World of the Second Sophistic: The World of the Second Sophistic, 119 |
12. Lucian, The Hall, 2 (2nd cent. CE - 2nd cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •rule, baths of caracalla Found in books: Borg (2008), Paideia: the World of the Second Sophistic: The World of the Second Sophistic, 120 |
13. Scriptores Historiae Augustae, Al. Sev., 34.2-34.4 (4th cent. CE - 5th cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •rule, baths of caracalla Found in books: Borg (2008), Paideia: the World of the Second Sophistic: The World of the Second Sophistic, 114 |
14. Scriptores Historiae Augustae, Hadrian, 17.6-17.7 (4th cent. CE - 5th cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •rule, baths of caracalla Found in books: Borg (2008), Paideia: the World of the Second Sophistic: The World of the Second Sophistic, 119 |
15. Various, Anthologia Graeca, 16.142 Tagged with subjects: •rule, baths of caracalla Found in books: Borg (2008), Paideia: the World of the Second Sophistic: The World of the Second Sophistic, 116, 117 |
16. Philostratus The Athenian, Imagines, None Tagged with subjects: •nan Found in books: Borg (2008), Paideia: the World of the Second Sophistic: The World of the Second Sophistic, 122 |