1. Cicero, De Finibus, 1.26 (2nd cent. BCE - 1st cent. BCE) Tagged with subjects: •presentist hedonism Found in books: Wolfsdorf (2020) 408 |
2. Cicero, On The Ends of Good And Evil, 1.26 (2nd cent. BCE - 1st cent. BCE) Tagged with subjects: •presentist hedonism Found in books: Wolfsdorf (2020) 408 1.26. Haec igitur Epicuri non probo, inquam. De cetero vellem equidem aut ipse doctrinis fuisset instructior— est enim, quod tibi ita videri necesse est, non satis politus iis artibus, quas qui tenent, eruditi appellantur —aut ne deterruisset alios a studiis. quamquam te quidem video minime esse deterritum. Quae cum dixissem, magis ut illum provocarem quam ut ipse loquerer, tum Triarius leniter leniter dett. leuiter arridens: Tu quidem, inquit, totum Tu quidem inquit totum tum quid totum inquit (inquid B) BE Epicurum paene e philosophorum choro sustulisti. quid ei reliquisti, nisi te, quoquo modo quoque modo A 1 quoque ut modo RN 1 V quoque ut id modo N 2 loqueretur, intellegere, quid diceret? aliena dixit in physicis nec ea ipsa, quae tibi probarentur; si qua in iis corrigere voluit, deteriora fecit. disserendi artem nullam habuit. voluptatem cum summum bonum diceret, primum in eo ipso parum vidit, deinde hoc quoque alienum; nam ante Aristippus, et ille melius. post melius add. in V Etenim quoniam detractis de ho- mine sensibus; idem in N (et enim cet ) ab alt. m. in marg. adscr. posito post melius signo eodemque in marg.; melius Etenim quoniam detractis de homine sensibus reliqui nichil est necesse est quid ad naturam aut contra sit a natura ipsa iudicari. Et expetendam et dolorem ipsum per se esse. addidisti R (cf. p. 13, 32 sqq. et p. 14, 8 sq.) addidisti ad extremum etiam indoctum fuisse. | |
|
3. Diogenes of Oenoanda, Fragments, 23.7, 23.8, 23.9, 23.10, 23.11, 23.12, 23.13, 23.14, 42.1, 42.2, 42.3, 42.4, 42.5, 42.6, 42.7, 42.8, 42.9, 49, 291.1-3.4, 342.4-15.1 (1st cent. CE - 2nd cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •nan Found in books: Wolfsdorf (2020) 406 |
4. Plutarch, Against Colotes, None (1st cent. CE - 2nd cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •nan Found in books: Wolfsdorf (2020) 408 |
5. Sextus, Against The Mathematicians, 7.192 (2nd cent. CE - 3rd cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •presentist hedonism Found in books: Wolfsdorf (2020) 383 |
6. Athenaeus, The Learned Banquet, None (2nd cent. CE - 3rd cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •presentist hedonism Found in books: Wolfsdorf (2020) 383 |
7. Aelian, Varia Historia, 14.6 (2nd cent. CE - 3rd cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •presentist hedonism Found in books: Wolfsdorf (2020) 384, 385 |
8. Diogenes Laertius, Lives of The Philosophers, 2.66, 2.89 (3rd cent. CE - 3rd cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •presentist hedonism Found in books: Wolfsdorf (2020) 384, 385 | 2.66. He was capable of adapting himself to place, time and person, and of playing his part appropriately under whatever circumstances. Hence he found more favour than anybody else with Dionysius, because he could always turn the situation to good account. He derived pleasure from what was present, and did not toil to procure the enjoyment of something not present Hence Diogenes called him the king's poodle Timon, too, sneered at him for luxury in these words:Such was the delicate nature of Aristippus, who groped after error by touch.He is said to have ordered a partridge to be bought at a cost of fifty drachmae, and, when someone censured him, he inquired, Would not you have given an obol for it? and, being answered in the affirmative, rejoined, Fifty drachmae are no more to me. 2.89. The removal of pain, however, which is put forward in Epicurus, seems to them not to be pleasure at all, any more than the absence of pleasure is pain. For both pleasure and pain they hold to consist in motion, whereas absence of pleasure like absence of pain is not motion, since painlessness is the condition of one who is, as it were, asleep. They assert that some people may fail to choose pleasure because their minds are perverted; not all mental pleasures and pains, however, are derived from bodily counterparts. For instance, we take disinterested delight in the prosperity of our country which is as real as our delight in our own prosperity. Nor again do they admit that pleasure is derived from the memory or expectation of good, which was a doctrine of Epicurus. |
|
9. Eusebius of Caesarea, Preparation For The Gospel, 14.18.32 (3rd cent. CE - 4th cent. CE) Tagged with subjects: •presentist hedonism Found in books: Wolfsdorf (2020) 383 |
10. Aristippus of Cyrene, Ssr Iv A, None Tagged with subjects: •nan Found in books: Wolfsdorf (2020) 406 |
11. Philodemus, De Electionibus Et Fugis, 2.11-2.15, 3.6-3.14, 17.1-17.3 Tagged with subjects: •presentist hedonism Found in books: Wolfsdorf (2020) 405 |