Home About Network of subjects Linked subjects heatmap Book indices included Search by subject Search by reference Browse subjects Browse texts

Tiresias: The Ancient Mediterranean Religions Source Database



9855
Pseudo Clementine Literature, Homilies, 2.15
NaN


Intertexts (texts cited often on the same page as the searched text):

10 results
1. Hebrew Bible, Numbers, 11.16 (9th cent. BCE - 3rd cent. BCE)

11.16. וַיֹּאמֶר יְהוָה אֶל־מֹשֶׁה אֶסְפָה־לִּי שִׁבְעִים אִישׁ מִזִּקְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל אֲשֶׁר יָדַעְתָּ כִּי־הֵם זִקְנֵי הָעָם וְשֹׁטְרָיו וְלָקַחְתָּ אֹתָם אֶל־אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד וְהִתְיַצְּבוּ שָׁם עִמָּךְ׃ 11.16. And the LORD said unto Moses: ‘Gather unto Me seventy men of the elders of Israel, whom thou knowest to be the elders of the people, and officers over them; and bring them unto the tent of meeting, that they may stand there with thee."
2. New Testament, Matthew, 23.2 (1st cent. CE - 1st cent. CE)

23.2. saying, "The scribes and the Pharisees sat on Moses' seat.
3. Anon., Leviticus Rabba, 31.4 (2nd cent. CE - 5th cent. CE)

31.4. דָּבָר אַחֵר, צַו אֶת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל, בַּר קַפָּרָא פָּתַח (תהלים יח, כט): כִּי אַתָּה תָּאִיר נֵרִי, אָמַר הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא לָאָדָם, נֵרְךָ בְּיָדִי וְנֵרִי בְיָדֶךָ, נֵרְךָ בְּיָדִי, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (משלי כ, כז): נֵר ה' נִשְׁמַת אָדָם, נֵרִי בְיָדֶךָ (ויקרא כד, ב): לְהַעֲלֹת נֵר תָּמִיד, אֶלָּא אָמַר הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא אִם הֵאַרְתָּ נֵרִי הֲרֵינִי מֵאִיר נֵרְךָ, הֱוֵי: צַו אֶת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל. דָּבָר אַחֵר, צַו אֶת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל, הֲדָא הוּא דִכְתִיב (שיר השירים ז, ו): רֹאשֵׁךְ עָלַיִךְ כַּכַּרְמֶל וְדַלַּת רֹאשֵׁךְ כָּאַרְגָּמָן, אָמַר הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא לְיִשְׂרָאֵל, הָרָשִׁים שֶׁבָּכֶם חֲבִיבִין עָלַי כְּאֵלִיָּהוּ שֶׁעָלָה לַכַּרְמֶל, הֲדָא הוּא דִכְתִיב (מלכים א יח, מב): וְאֵלִיָּהוּ עָלָה אֶל רֹאשׁ הַכַּרְמֶל וַיִּגְהַר אַרְצָה וַיָּשֶׂם פָּנָיו בֵּין בִּרְכָּו, וְלָמָּה שָׂם פָּנָיו בֵּין בִּרְכָּיו, אָמַר לִפְנֵי הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא, רִבּוֹנוֹ שֶׁל עוֹלָם אִם אֵין לָנוּ זְכוּת הַבֵּט לִבְרִית מִילָה. (שיר השירים ז, ו): וְדַלַּת רֹאשֵׁךְ כָּאַרְגָּמָן, אָמַר הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא הַדַּלִּים שֶׁבָּכֶם חֲבִיבִין עָלַי כְּדָוִד, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (זכריה יב, ח): וְהָיָה הַנִּכְשָׁל בָּהֶם בַּיּוֹם הַהוּא כְּדָוִיד, וְיֵשׁ אוֹמְרִים כְּדָנִיֵּאל, דִּכְתִיב בֵּיהּ (דניאל ה, כט): וְהַלְבִּשׁוּ לְדָנִיֵּאל אַרְגְּוָנָא. (שיר השירים ז, ו): מֶלֶךְ אָסוּר בָּרְהָטִים, שֶׁאָסַר הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא עַצְמוֹ בִּשְׁבוּעָה שֶׁהוּא מַשְׁרֶה שְׁכִינָתוֹ בְּתוֹךְ רָהִיטִין שֶׁל יַעֲקֹב אָבִינוּ, בִּזְכוּת מִי, רַבִּי אַבָּא בַּר כַּהֲנָא אָמַר בִּזְכוּתוֹ שֶׁל אַבְרָהָם אָבִינוּ, דִּכְתִיב (בראשית יח, ז): וְאֶל הַבָּקָר רָץ אַבְרָהָם. רַבִּי לֵוִי אָמַר בִּזְכוּתוֹ שֶׁל יַעֲקֹב, דִּכְתִיב בֵּיהּ (בראשית ל, לח): וַיַּצֵּג אֶת הַמַּקְלוֹת אֲשֶׁר פִּצֵּל בָּרְהָטִים. אָמַר רַבִּי בֶּרֶכְיָה מֶלֶךְ אָסוּר בָּרְהָטִים, זֶה משֶׁה, דִּכְתִיב בֵּיהּ (דברים לג, ה): וַיְהִי בִישֻׁרוּן מֶלֶךְ, אָסוּר בָּרְהָטִים, שֶׁגָּזַר הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא עָלָיו שֶׁלֹּא יִכָּנֵס לְאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל, בִּשְׁבִיל מִי, בִּשְׁבִיל רְהָטִים שֶׁל מֵי מְרִיבָה, הֲדָא הוּא דִכְתִיב (במדבר כ, יג): הֵמָּה מֵי מְרִיבָה אֲשֶׁר רָבוּ בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה מְשָׁלוֹ מָשָׁל לְמָה הַדָּבָר דּוֹמֶה לְמֶלֶךְ שֶׁגָּזַר וְאָמַר כָּל מִי שֶׁיִּלְקֹט וְיֹאכַל מִפֵּרוֹת שְׁבִיעִית יְהוּ מַחֲזִירִין אוֹתוֹ בַּקַּמְפּוֹן, הָלְכָה אִשָּׁה אַחַת בַּת טוֹבִים וְלִקְטָה וְאָכְלָה מִפֵּרוֹת שְׁבִיעִית, הִתְחִילוּ מַחֲזִירִין אוֹתָהּ בַּקַּמְפּוֹן וְהָיְתָה צוֹוַחַת וְאוֹמֶרֶת בְּבַקָּשָׁה מִמְּךָ אֲדוֹנִי הַמֶּלֶךְ תְּלֵה אֶת הַפַּגִּין הַלָּלוּ בְּצַוָּארִי כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יְהוּ הַבְּרִיּוֹת אוֹמְרוֹת דּוֹמֶה לָנוּ שֶׁנִּמְצָא בָהּ דָּבָר שֶׁל עֶרְוָה אוֹ דָּבָר שֶׁל כְּשָׁפִים, אֶלָּא מִתּוֹךְ שֶׁרוֹאִים אֶת הַפַּגִּין בְּצַוָּארִי הֵן יוֹדְעִין שֶׁבִּשְׁבִילָן אֲנִי מְחַזֶּרֶת. כָּךְ אָמַר משֶׁה לִפְנֵי הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא רִבּוֹן הָעוֹלָם כְּתֹב בְּתוֹרָתְךָ מִפְּנֵי מָה אֵינִי נִכְנַס לָאָרֶץ, שֶׁלֹּא יְהוּ יִשְׂרָאֵל אוֹמְרִים דּוֹמֶה לָנוּ שֶׁזִּיֵּף משֶׁה אֶת הַתּוֹרָה, אוֹ אָמַר דָּבָר שֶׁלֹּא נִצְטַוָּה. אָמַר לוֹ הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא חַיֶּיךָ שֶׁאֲנִי כּוֹתֵב שֶׁלֹּא הָיְתָה אֶלָּא עַל הַמָּיִם, הֲדָא הוּא דִכְתִיב (במדבר כז, יד): כַּאֲשֶׁר מְרִיתֶם פִּי בְּמִדְבַּר צִן. רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן מְשָׁלוֹ מָשָׁל לְמָה הַדָּבָר דּוֹמֶה לְמֶלֶךְ שֶׁמְהַלֵּךְ בַּדֶּרֶךְ וּבְנוֹ עִמּוֹ עַל קָרוֹכִין, כֵּיוָן שֶׁהִגִּיעוּ לְמָקוֹם צַר נֶהְפְּכָה קָרוֹכִין עַל בְּנוֹ, נִסְמֵית עֵינוֹ נִקְטְעָה יָדוֹ נִשְׁבְּרָה רַגְלוֹ, כֵּיוָן שֶׁהָיָה הַמֶּלֶךְ מַגִּיעַ לְאוֹתוֹ מָקוֹם, הָיָה מַזְכִּיר וְאוֹמֵר אוֹי לִי כָּאן נִזּוֹק בְּרִי, כָּאן נִסְמֵית עֵינוֹ, כָּאן נִקְטְעָה יָדוֹ, כָּאן נִשְׁבְּרָה רַגְלוֹ. כָּךְ הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא מַזְכִּיר בְּתוֹרָתוֹ שָׁלשׁ פְּעָמִים מֵי מְרִיבָה, כְּלוֹמַר כָּאן הָרַגְתִּי אֶת משֶׁה, כָּאן הָרַגְתִּי אֶת אַהֲרֹן, כָּאן הָרַגְתִּי אֶת מִרְיָם, הֲדָא הוּא דִכְתִיב (תהלים קמא, ו): נִשְׁמְטוּ בִידֵי סֶלַע שֹׁפְטֵיהֶם וְשָׁמְעוּ אֲמָרַי כִּי נָעֵמוּ. רַב נַחְמָן אָמַר מֶלֶךְ זֶה משֶׁה, דִּכְתִיב: וַיְהִי בִישֻׁרוּן מֶלֶךְ, אָמַר הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא לְמשֶׁה אֲנִי מִנִּיתִיךָ מֶלֶךְ עַל יִשְׂרָאֵל, דַּרְכּוֹ שֶׁל מֶלֶךְ לִהְיוֹת גּוֹזֵר וַאֲחֵרִים מְקַיְּמִין, כָּךְ תְּהֵא גוֹזֵר וְיִשְׂרָאֵל מְקַיְּמִין, הֲדָא הוּא דִכְתִיב: צַו אֶת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל.
4. Anon., Sifre Deuteronomy, 26 (2nd cent. CE - 4th cent. CE)

5. Hippolytus, Refutation of All Heresies, 5.7.40, 9.14.1 (2nd cent. CE - 3rd cent. CE)

6. Irenaeus, Refutation of All Heresies, 9.14.1, 16.1 (2nd cent. CE - 3rd cent. CE)

7. Origen, Against Celsus, 6.24-6.28 (3rd cent. CE - 3rd cent. CE)

6.24. After the instance borrowed from the Mithraic mysteries, Celsus declares that he who would investigate the Christian mysteries, along with the aforesaid Persian, will, on comparing the two together, and on unveiling the rites of the Christians, see in this way the difference between them. Now, wherever he was able to give the names of the various sects, he was nothing loth to quote those with which he thought himself acquainted; but when he ought most of all to have done this, if they were really known to him, and to have informed us which was the sect that makes use of the diagram he has drawn, he has not done so. It seems to me, however, that it is from some statements of a very insignificant sect called Ophites, which he has misunderstood, that, in my opinion, he has partly borrowed what he says about the diagram. Now, as we have always been animated by a love of learning, we have fallen in with this diagram, and we have found in it the representations of men who, as Paul says, creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with various lusts; ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. The diagram was, however, so destitute of all credibility, that neither these easily deceived women, nor the most rustic class of men, nor those who were ready to be led away by any plausible pretender whatever, ever gave their assent to the diagram. Nor, indeed, have we ever met any individual, although we have visited many parts of the earth, and have sought out all those who anywhere made profession of knowledge, that placed any faith in this diagram. 6.25. In this diagram were described ten circles, distinct from each other, but united by one circle, which was said to be the soul of all things, and was called Leviathan. This Leviathan, the Jewish Scriptures say, whatever they mean by the expression, was created by God for a plaything; for we find in the Psalms: In wisdom have You made all things: the earth is full of Your creatures; so is this great and wide sea. There go the ships; small animals with great; there is this dragon, which You have formed to play therein. Instead of the word dragon, the term leviathan is in the Hebrew. This impious diagram, then, said of this leviathan, which is so clearly depreciated by the Psalmist, that it was the soul which had travelled through all things! We observed, also, in the diagram, the being named Behemoth, placed as it were under the lowest circle. The inventor of this accursed diagram had inscribed this leviathan at its circumference and centre, thus placing its name in two separate places. Moreover, Celsus says that the diagram was divided by a thick black line, and this line he asserted was called Gehenna, which is Tartarus. Now as we found that Gehenna was mentioned in the Gospel as a place of punishment, we searched to see whether it is mentioned anywhere in the ancient Scriptures, and especially because the Jews too use the word. And we ascertained that where the valley of the son of Ennom was named in Scripture in the Hebrew, instead of valley, with fundamentally the same meaning, it was termed both the valley of Ennom and also Geenna. And continuing our researches, we find that what was termed Geenna, or the valley of Ennom, was included in the lot of the tribe of Benjamin, in which Jerusalem also was situated. And seeking to ascertain what might be the inference from the heavenly Jerusalem belonging to the lot of Benjamin and the valley of Ennom, we find a certain confirmation of what is said regarding the place of punishment, intended for the purification of such souls as are to be purified by torments, agreeably to the saying: The Lord comes like a refiner's fire, and like fullers' soap: and He shall sit as a refiner and purifier of silver and of gold. 6.26. It is in the precincts of Jerusalem, then, that punishments will be inflicted upon those who undergo the process of purification, who have received into the substance of their soul the elements of wickedness, which in a certain place is figuratively termed lead, and on that account iniquity is represented in Zechariah as sitting upon a talent of lead. But the remarks which might be made on this topic are neither to be made to all, nor to be uttered on the present occasion; for it is not unattended with danger to commit to writing the explanation of such subjects, seeing the multitude need no further instruction than that which relates to the punishment of sinners; while to ascend beyond this is not expedient, for the sake of those who are with difficulty restrained, even by fear of eternal punishment, from plunging into any degree of wickedness, and into the flood of evils which result from sin. The doctrine of Geenna, then, is unknown both to the diagram and to Celsus: for had it been otherwise, the framers of the former would not have boasted of their pictures of animals and diagrams, as if the truth were represented by these; nor would Celsus, in his treatise against the Christians, have introduced among the charges directed against them statements which they never uttered instead of what was spoken by some who perhaps are no longer in existence, but have altogether disappeared, or been reduced to a very few individuals, and these easily counted. And as it does not beseem those who profess the doctrines of Plato to offer a defense of Epicurus and his impious opinions, so neither is it for us to defend the diagram, or to refute the accusations brought against it by Celsus. We may therefore allow his charges on these points to pass as superfluous and useless, for we would censure more severely than Celsus any who should be carried away by such opinions. 6.27. After the matter of the diagram, he brings forward certain monstrous statements, in the form of question and answer, regarding what is called by ecclesiastical writers the seal, statements which did not arise from imperfect information; such as that he who impresses the seal is called father, and he who is sealed is called young man and son; and who answers, I have been anointed with white ointment from the tree of life,- things which we never heard to have occurred even among the heretics. In the next place, he determines even the number mentioned by those who deliver over the seal, as that of seven angels, who attach themselves to both sides of the soul of the dying body; the one party being named angels of light, the others 'archontics;' and he asserts that the ruler of those named 'archontics' is termed the 'accursed' god. Then, laying hold of the expression, he assails, not without reason, those who venture to use such language; and on that account we entertain a similar feeling of indignation with those who censure such individuals, if indeed there exist any who call the God of the Jews- who sends rain and thunder, and who is the Creator of this world, and the God of Moses, and of the cosmogony which he records - an accursed divinity. Celsus, however, appears to have had in view in employing these expressions, not a rational object, but one of a most irrational kind, arising out of his hatred towards us, which is so unlike a philosopher. For his aim was, that those who are unacquainted with our customs should, on perusing his treatise, at once assail us as if we called the noble Creator of this world an accursed divinity. He appears to me, indeed, to have acted like those Jews who, when Christianity began to be first preached, scattered abroad false reports of the Gospel, such as that Christians offered up an infant in sacrifice, and partook of its flesh; and again, that the professors of Christianity, wishing to do the 'works of darkness,' used to extinguish the lights (in their meetings), and each one to have sexual intercourse with any woman whom he chanced to meet. These calumnies have long exercised, although unreasonably, an influence over the minds of very many, leading those who are aliens to the Gospel to believe that Christians are men of such a character; and even at the present day they mislead some, and prevent them from entering even into the simple intercourse of conversation with those who are Christians. 6.28. With some such object as this in view does Celsus seem to have been actuated, when he alleged that Christians term the Creator an accursed divinity; in order that he who believes these charges of his against us, should, if possible, arise and exterminate the Christians as the most impious of mankind. Confusing, moreover, things that are distinct, he states also the reason why the God of the Mosaic cosmogony is termed accursed, asserting that such is his character, and worthy of execration in the opinion of those who so regard him, inasmuch as he pronounced a curse upon the serpent, who introduced the first human beings to the knowledge of good and evil. Now he ought to have known that those who have espoused the cause of the serpent, because he gave good advice to the first human beings, and who go far beyond the Titans and Giants of fable, and are on this account called Ophites, are so far from being Christians, that they bring accusations against Jesus to as great a degree as Celsus himself; and they do not admit any one into their assembly until he has uttered maledictions against Jesus. See, then, how irrational is the procedure of Celsus, who, in his discourse against the Christians, represents as such those who will not even listen to the name of Jesus, or omit even that He was a wise man, or a person of virtuous character! What, then, could evince greater folly or madness, not only on the part of those who wish to derive their name from the serpent as the author of good, but also on the part of Celsus, who thinks that the accusations with which the Ophites are charged, are chargeable also against the Christians! Long ago, indeed, that Greek philosopher who preferred a state of poverty, and who exhibited the pattern of a happy life, showing that he was not excluded from happiness although he was possessed of nothing, termed himself a Cynic; while these impious wretches, as not being human beings, whose enemy the serpent is, but as being serpents, pride themselves upon being called Ophites from the serpent, which is an animal most hostile to and greatly dreaded by man, and boast of one Euphrates as the introducer of these unhallowed opinions.
8. Pseudo Clementine Literature, Homilies, 1.19, 2.12, 2.16-2.18, 3.19-3.22, 3.24, 4.13, 7.4, 8.7, 9.16, 11.28 (3rd cent. CE - 4th cent. CE)

9. Pseudo Clementine Literature, Recognitiones (E Pseudocaesario), 1.27 (3rd cent. CE - 4th cent. CE)

10. Pseudo Clementine Literature, Recognitions, 1.27, 4.19 (4th cent. CE - 5th cent. CE)

1.27. In the beginning, when God had made the heaven and the earth, Genesis 1:1 as one house, the shadow which was cast by the mundane bodies involved in darkness those things which were enclosed in it. But when the will of God had introduced light, that darkness which had been caused by the shadows of bodies was straightway dispelled: then at length light is appointed for the day, darkness for the night. And now the water which was within the world, in the middle space of that first heaven and earth, congealed as if with frost, and solid as crystal, is distended, and the middle spaces of the heaven and earth are separated as by a firmament of this sort; and that firmament the Creator called heaven, so called by the name of that previously made: and so He divided into two portions that fabric of the universe, although it was but one house. The reason of the division was this, that the upper portion might afford a dwelling-place to angels, and the lower to men. After this, the place of the sea and the chaos which had been made received that portion of the water which remained below, by order of the eternal Will; and these flowing down to the sunk and hollow places, the dry land appeared; and the gatherings of the waters were made seas. And after this the earth, which had appeared, produced various species of herbs and shrubs. It gave forth fountains also, and rivers, not only in the plains, but on the mountains. And so all things were prepared, that men who were to dwell in it might have it in their power to use all these things according to their will, that is, either for good or evil. 4.19. There is also another error of the demons, which they suggest to the senses of men, that they should think that those things which they suffer, they suffer from such as are called gods, in order that thereby, offering sacrifices and gifts, as if to propitiate them, they may strengthen the worship of false religion, and avoid us who are interested in their salvation, that they may be freed from error; but this they do, as I have said, not knowing that these things are suggested to them by demons, for fear they should be saved. It is therefore in the power of every one, since man has been made possessed of free-will, whether he shall hear us to life, or the demons to destruction. Also to some, the demons, appearing visibly under various figures, sometimes throw out threats, sometimes promise relief from sufferings, that they may instil into those whom they deceive the opinion of their being gods, and that it may not be known that they are demons. But they are not concealed from us, who know the mysteries of the creation, and for what reason it is permitted to the demons to do those things in the present world; how it is allowed them to transform themselves into what figures they please, and to suggest evil thoughts, and to convey themselves, by means of meats and of drink consecrated to them, into the minds or bodies of those who partake of it, and to concoct vain dreams to further the worship of some idol.


Subjects of this text:

subject book bibliographic info
aaron Piovanelli, Burke, Pettipiece, Rediscovering the Apocryphal Continent: New Perspectives on Early Christian and Late Antique Apocryphal Textsand Traditions. De Gruyter: 2015 (2015) 106
christians, christianity Brouwer and Vimercati, Fate, Providence and Free Will: Philosophy and Religion in Dialogue in the Early Imperial Age (2020) 182
demons, gnostics on Brouwer and Vimercati, Fate, Providence and Free Will: Philosophy and Religion in Dialogue in the Early Imperial Age (2020) 182
fate (εἱμαρμένη), judaeo-christian gnostics on Brouwer and Vimercati, Fate, Providence and Free Will: Philosophy and Religion in Dialogue in the Early Imperial Age (2020) 182
gentiles Piovanelli, Burke, Pettipiece, Rediscovering the Apocryphal Continent: New Perspectives on Early Christian and Late Antique Apocryphal Textsand Traditions. De Gruyter: 2015 (2015) 106
gnostics/gnosticism, on matter (ὕλη) Brouwer and Vimercati, Fate, Providence and Free Will: Philosophy and Religion in Dialogue in the Early Imperial Age (2020) 182
gnostics/gnosticism Brouwer and Vimercati, Fate, Providence and Free Will: Philosophy and Religion in Dialogue in the Early Imperial Age (2020) 182
jesus of nazareth, as the true prophet Piovanelli, Burke, Pettipiece, Rediscovering the Apocryphal Continent: New Perspectives on Early Christian and Late Antique Apocryphal Textsand Traditions. De Gruyter: 2015 (2015) 106
jewish christianity Piovanelli, Burke, Pettipiece, Rediscovering the Apocryphal Continent: New Perspectives on Early Christian and Late Antique Apocryphal Textsand Traditions. De Gruyter: 2015 (2015) 106
john the baptist Piovanelli, Burke, Pettipiece, Rediscovering the Apocryphal Continent: New Perspectives on Early Christian and Late Antique Apocryphal Textsand Traditions. De Gruyter: 2015 (2015) 106
judaeo-christian gnostics, on fate (εἱμαρμένη) Brouwer and Vimercati, Fate, Providence and Free Will: Philosophy and Religion in Dialogue in the Early Imperial Age (2020) 182
judaeo-christian gnostics Brouwer and Vimercati, Fate, Providence and Free Will: Philosophy and Religion in Dialogue in the Early Imperial Age (2020) 182
judaism Brouwer and Vimercati, Fate, Providence and Free Will: Philosophy and Religion in Dialogue in the Early Imperial Age (2020) 182
matter (ὕλη), gnostics on Brouwer and Vimercati, Fate, Providence and Free Will: Philosophy and Religion in Dialogue in the Early Imperial Age (2020) 182
moses Nicklas and Spittler, Credible, Incredible: The Miraculous in the Ancient Mediterranean. (2013) 218; Piovanelli, Burke, Pettipiece, Rediscovering the Apocryphal Continent: New Perspectives on Early Christian and Late Antique Apocryphal Textsand Traditions. De Gruyter: 2015 (2015) 106
oral torah Piovanelli, Burke, Pettipiece, Rediscovering the Apocryphal Continent: New Perspectives on Early Christian and Late Antique Apocryphal Textsand Traditions. De Gruyter: 2015 (2015) 106
pharisees Piovanelli, Burke, Pettipiece, Rediscovering the Apocryphal Continent: New Perspectives on Early Christian and Late Antique Apocryphal Textsand Traditions. De Gruyter: 2015 (2015) 106
redaction criticism Piovanelli, Burke, Pettipiece, Rediscovering the Apocryphal Continent: New Perspectives on Early Christian and Late Antique Apocryphal Textsand Traditions. De Gruyter: 2015 (2015) 106
syzygies (doctrine)' Piovanelli, Burke, Pettipiece, Rediscovering the Apocryphal Continent: New Perspectives on Early Christian and Late Antique Apocryphal Textsand Traditions. De Gruyter: 2015 (2015) 106