Home About Network of subjects Linked subjects heatmap Book indices included Search by subject Search by reference Browse subjects Browse texts

Tiresias: The Ancient Mediterranean Religions Source Database



9645
Polybius, Histories, 3.30.4


εἰ δὲ τὴν Σαρδόνος ἀφαίρεσιν καὶ τὰ σὺν ταύτῃ χρήματα, πάντως ὁμολογητέον εὐλόγως πεπολεμηκέναι τὸν κατʼ Ἀννίβαν πόλεμον τοὺς Καρχηδονίους· καιρῷ γὰρ πεισθέντες ἠμύνοντο σὺν καιρῷ τοὺς βλάψαντας. If, however, we take the cause of the war to have been the robbery of Sardinia and the tribute then exacted, we must certainly confess that they had good reason for entering on the Hannibalic war, since having yielded only to circumstances, they now availed themselves of circumstances to be avenged on those who had injured them. <


Intertexts (texts cited often on the same page as the searched text):

2 results
1. Polybius, Histories, 3.10.3-3.10.5, 3.15.5-3.15.7, 3.15.10, 6.56.1, 9.11.2 (2nd cent. BCE - 2nd cent. BCE)

3.10.3.  but as the Romans refused to negotiate, the Carthaginians had to yield to circumstances, and though deeply aggrieved they were powerless, and evacuated Sardinia, agreeing also to pay twelve hundred talents in addition to the sum previously exacted, in order not to be forced to accept war at that time. 3.10.4.  This, then, we must take to be the second and principal cause of the subsequent war; 3.10.5.  for Hamilcar, with the anger felt by all his compatriots at this last outrage added to his old indignation, as soon as he had finally crushed the mutiny of the mercenaries and secured the safety of his country, at once threw all his efforts into the conquest of Spain, with the object of using the resources thus obtained for the war against Rome. 3.15.5.  The Romans protested against his attacking Saguntum, which they said was under their protection, or crossing the Ebro, contrary to the treaty engagements entered into in Hasdrubal's time. 3.15.6.  Hannibal, being young, full of martial ardour, encouraged by the success of his enterprises, and spurred on by his long-standing enmity to Rome 3.15.7.  in his answer to the legates affected to be guarding the interests of the Saguntines and accused the Romans of having a short time previously, when there was a party quarrel at Saguntum and they were called in to arbitrate, unjustly put to death some of the leading men. The Carthaginians, he said, would not overlook this violation of good faith for it was from of old the principle of Carthage never to neglect the cause of the victims of injustice. 3.15.10.  How much better would it have been for him to demand from the Romans the restitution of Sardinia, and at the same time of the tribute which they had so unjustly exacted, availing themselves of the misfortunes of Carthage, and to threaten war in the event of refusal! 6.56.1.  Again, the laws and customs relating to the acquisition of wealth are better in Rome than at Carthage. 9.11.2.  and while thinking they had put an end to the war against the Romans began quarrelling with each other, constant friction being caused by that covetousness and love of domination which is innate in Phoenicians. Hasdrubal, son of Gesco, was one of them
2. Diodorus Siculus, Historical Library, 5.35.4 (1st cent. BCE - 1st cent. BCE)

5.35.4.  Now the natives were ignorant of the use of the silver, and the Phoenicians, as they pursued their commercial enterprises and learned of what had taken place, purchased the silver in exchange for other wares of little if any worth. And this was the reason why the Phoenicians, as they transported this silver to Greece and Asia and to all other peoples, acquired great wealth. So far indeed did the merchants go in their greed that, in case their boats were fully laden and there still remained a great amount of silver, they would hammer the lead off the anchors and have the silver perform the service of the lead. And the result was that the Phoenicians, as in the course of many years they prospered greatly, thanks to commerce of this kind, sent forth many colonies, some to Sicily and its neighbouring islands, and others to Libya, Sardinia, and Iberia.


Subjects of this text:

subject book bibliographic info
activities Gruen, Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (2011) 125
alexander the great Gruen, Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (2011) 125
alphabet, introduction of Gruen, Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (2011) 125
carthage/carthaginians Gruen, Ethnicity in the Ancient World - Did it matter (2020) 61
disparagement, of phoenicians by polybius Gruen, Ethnicity in the Ancient World - Did it matter (2020) 61
hannibal Gruen, Ethnicity in the Ancient World - Did it matter (2020) 61
innate capacity as determining ethnicity, rarely suggested by polybius Gruen, Ethnicity in the Ancient World - Did it matter (2020) 61
livy Gruen, Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (2011) 125
phoenicians Gruen, Ethnicity in the Ancient World - Did it matter (2020) 61
polybius, on carthaginians Gruen, Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (2011) 125
polybius Gruen, Ethnicity in the Ancient World - Did it matter (2020) 61
punic war, second punic war Gruen, Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (2011) 125
punic wars Gruen, Ethnicity in the Ancient World - Did it matter (2020) 61; Gruen, Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (2011) 125
punica fides, as stereotype Gruen, Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (2011) 125
rhetorical context as shaping evidence Gruen, Ethnicity in the Ancient World - Did it matter (2020) 61
rome/romans, and carthage Gruen, Ethnicity in the Ancient World - Did it matter (2020) 61
rome and romans, and carthaginians Gruen, Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (2011) 125
scipio africanus Gruen, Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (2011) 125
treachery, carthaginians and Gruen, Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (2011) 125
treaty violations, carthaginians and' Gruen, Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (2011) 125