1. Hesiod, Works And Days, 202-212 (8th cent. BCE - 7th cent. BCE)
Tagged with subjects: • Corycian gardener, as discrepant from Golden Age ideal • discrepancy, between words and deeds
Found in books: Kirichenko (2022), Greek Literature and the Ideal: The Pragmatics of Space from the Archaic to the Hellenistic Age, 74, 75, 81, 82; Perkell (1989), The Poet's Truth: A Study of the Poet in Virgil's Georgics, 135, 136, 137
sup>
202 νῦν δʼ αἶνον βασιλεῦσιν ἐρέω φρονέουσι καὶ αὐτοῖς·'203 ὧδʼ ἴρηξ προσέειπεν ἀηδόνα ποικιλόδειρον 204 ὕψι μάλʼ ἐν νεφέεσσι φέρων ὀνύχεσσι μεμαρπώς· 205 ἣ δʼ ἐλεόν, γναμπτοῖσι πεπαρμένη ἀμφʼ ὀνύχεσσι, 206 μύρετο· τὴν ὅγʼ ἐπικρατέως πρὸς μῦθον ἔειπεν· 207 δαιμονίη, τί λέληκας; ἔχει νύ σε πολλὸν ἀρείων· 208 τῇ δʼ εἶς, ᾗ σʼ ἂν ἐγώ περ ἄγω καὶ ἀοιδὸν ἐοῦσαν· 209 δεῖπνον δʼ, αἴ κʼ ἐθέλω, ποιήσομαι ἠὲ μεθήσω. 210 ἄφρων δʼ, ὅς κʼ ἐθέλῃ πρὸς κρείσσονας ἀντιφερίζειν· 211 νίκης τε στέρεται πρός τʼ αἴσχεσιν ἄλγεα πάσχει. 212 ὣς ἔφατʼ ὠκυπέτης ἴρηξ, τανυσίπτερος ὄρνις. ' None | sup>
202 Might will be right and shame shall cease to be,'203 The bad will harm the good whom they shall maim 204 With crooked words, swearing false oaths. We’ll see 205 Envy among the wretched, foul of face 206 And voice, adoring villainy, and then 207 Into Olympus from the endless space 208 Mankind inhabits, leaving mortal men, 209 Fair flesh veiled by white robes, shall Probity 210 And Shame depart, and there’ll be grievous pain 211 For men: against all evil there shall be 212 No safeguard. Now I’ll tell, for lords who know ' None |
|
2. Plato, Phaedo, None (5th cent. BCE - 4th cent. BCE)
Tagged with subjects: • Academy, disagreements over interpretation of Plato’s dialogues
Found in books: Bryan (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 13; Wardy and Warren (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 13
| 118a ὁ δ’ οὐκ ἔφη. ΦΑΙΔ. καὶ μετὰ τοῦτο αὖθις τὰς κνήμας: καὶ ἐπανιὼν οὕτως ἡμῖν ἐπεδείκνυτο ὅτι ψύχοιτό τε καὶ πήγνυτο. καὶ αὐτὸς ἥπτετο καὶ εἶπεν ὅτι, ἐπειδὰν πρὸς τῇ καρδίᾳ γένηται αὐτῷ, τότε οἰχήσεται. unit="para"/ἤδη οὖν σχεδόν τι αὐτοῦ ἦν τὰ περὶ τὸ ἦτρον ψυχόμενα, καὶ ἐκκαλυψάμενος — ἐνεκεκάλυπτο γάρ — εἶπεν — ὃ δὴ τελευταῖον ἐφθέγξατο — ὦ Κρίτων, ἔφη, τῷ Ἀσκληπιῷ ὀφείλομεν ἀλεκτρυόνα: ἀλλὰ ἀπόδοτε καὶ μὴ ἀμελήσητε. ἀλλὰ ταῦτα, ἔφη, ἔσται, ὁ Κρίτων : ἀλλ᾽ ὅρα εἴ τι ἄλλο λέγεις. ταῦτα ἐρομένου αὐτοῦ οὐδὲν ἔτι ἀπεκρίνατο, ἀλλ’ ὀλίγον χρόνον διαλιπὼν ἐκινήθη τε καὶ ὁ ἄνθρωπος ἐξεκάλυψεν αὐτόν, καὶ ὃς τὰ ὄμματα ἔστησεν: ἰδὼν δὲ ὁ Κρίτων συνέλαβε τὸ στόμα καὶ τοὺς ὀφθαλμούς. ἥδε ἡ τελευτή, ὦ Ἐχέκρατες, τοῦ ἑταίρου ἡμῖν ἐγένετο, ἀνδρός, ὡς ἡμεῖς φαῖμεν ἄν, τῶν τότε ὧν ἐπειράθημεν ἀρίστου καὶ ἄλλως φρονιμωτάτου καὶ δικαιοτάτου.'' None | 118a his thighs; and passing upwards in this way he showed us that he was growing cold and rigid. And again he touched him and said that when it reached his heart, he would be gone. The chill had now reached the region about the groin, and uncovering his face, which had been covered, he said—and these were his last words— Crito, we owe a cock to Aesculapius. Pay it and do not neglect it. That, said Crito, shall be done; but see if you have anything else to say. To this question he made no reply, but after a little while he moved; the attendant uncovered him; his eyes were fixed. And Crito when he saw it, closed his mouth and eyes.Such was the end, Echecrates, of our friend, who was, as we may say, of all those of his time whom we have known, the best and wisest and most righteous man.'' None |
|
3. Plato, Phaedrus, None (5th cent. BCE - 4th cent. BCE)
Tagged with subjects: • Academy, disagreements over interpretation of Plato’s dialogues
Found in books: Bryan (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 97; Wardy and Warren (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 97
| 274b πάσχειν ὅτι ἄν τῳ συμβῇ παθεῖν. ΦΑΙ. καὶ μάλα. ΣΩ. οὐκοῦν τὸ μὲν τέχνης τε καὶ ἀτεχνίας λόγων πέρι ἱκανῶς ἐχέτω. ΦΑΙ. τί μήν; ΣΩ. τὸ δʼ εὐπρεπείας δὴ γραφῆς πέρι καὶ ἀπρεπείας, πῇ γιγνόμενον καλῶς ἂν ἔχοι καὶ ὅπῃ ἀπρεπῶς, λοιπόν. ἦ γάρ; ΦΑΙ. ναί. ΣΩ. οἶσθʼ οὖν ὅπῃ μάλιστα θεῷ χαριῇ λόγων πέρι πράττων ἢ λέγων; ΦΑΙ. οὐδαμῶς· σὺ δέ;'' None | 274b noble objects, no matter what happens to us. Phaedrus. Certainly. Socrates. We have, then, said enough about the art of speaking and that which is no art. Phaedrus. Assuredly. Socrates. But we have still to speak of propriety and impropriety in writing, how it should be done and how it is improper, have we not? Phaedrus. Yes. Socrates. Do you know how you can act or speak about rhetoric so as to please God best? Phaedrus. Not at all; do you?'' None |
|
4. Plato, Timaeus, None (5th cent. BCE - 4th cent. BCE)
Tagged with subjects: • Academy, disagreements over interpretation of Plato’s dialogues
Found in books: Bryan (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 94; Wardy and Warren (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 94
| 48e ἐπικαλεσάμενοι πάλιν ἀρχώμεθα λέγειν. ΤΙ. τὰ μὲν γὰρ δύο ἱκανὰ ἦν ἐπὶ τοῖς ἔμπροσθεν λεχθεῖσιν, ἓν μὲν ὡς παραδείγματος εἶδος ὑποτεθέν, νοητὸν καὶ ἀεὶ κατὰ ταὐτὰ ὄν, μίμημα δὲ'' None | 48e to a conclusion based on likelihood, and thus begin our account once more. Tim. For our former exposition those two were sufficient, one of them being assumed as a Model Form, intelligible and ever uniformly existent,'' None |
|
5. None, None, nan (5th cent. BCE - 4th cent. BCE)
Tagged with subjects: • Academy, disagreements over interpretation of Plato’s dialogues
Found in books: Bryan (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 81; Wardy and Warren (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 81
|
6. None, None, nan (4th cent. BCE - 4th cent. BCE)
Tagged with subjects: • Academy, disagreements over interpretation of Plato’s dialogues
Found in books: Bryan (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 93, 94; Wardy and Warren (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 93, 94
|
7. None, None, nan (4th cent. BCE - 4th cent. BCE)
Tagged with subjects: • Academy, disagreements over interpretation of Plato’s dialogues
Found in books: Bryan (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 88; Wardy and Warren (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 88
|
8. None, None, nan (4th cent. BCE - 4th cent. BCE)
Tagged with subjects: • Academy, disagreements over interpretation of Plato’s dialogues
Found in books: Bryan (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 95; Wardy and Warren (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 95
|
9. None, None, nan (4th cent. BCE - 4th cent. BCE)
Tagged with subjects: • Academy, disagreements over interpretation of Plato’s dialogues
Found in books: Bryan (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 94; Wardy and Warren (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 94
|
10. None, None, nan (4th cent. BCE - 4th cent. BCE)
Tagged with subjects: • Academy, disagreements over interpretation of Plato’s dialogues
Found in books: Bryan (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 96; Wardy and Warren (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 96
|
11. None, None, nan (4th cent. BCE - 3rd cent. BCE)
Tagged with subjects: • Academy, disagreements over interpretation of Plato’s dialogues
Found in books: Bryan (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 97; Wardy and Warren (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 97
|
12. Diogenes Laertius, Lives of The Philosophers, 3.25, 3.37, 9.88 (3rd cent. CE - 3rd cent. CE)
Tagged with subjects: • Academy, disagreements over interpretation of Plato’s dialogues • Clement of Alexandria, on disagreements between sects • discrepancy
Found in books: Boulluec (2022), The Notion of Heresy in Greek Literature in the Second and Third Centuries, 384; Bryan (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 82, 96; Vogt (2015), Pyrrhonian Skepticism in Diogenes Laertius. 61, 158; Wardy and Warren (2018), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, 82, 96
| sup>
3.25 He was also the first philosopher who controverted the speech of Lysias, the son of Cephalus, which he has set out word for word in the Phaedrus, and the first to study the significance of grammar. And, as he was the first to attack the views of almost all his predecessors, the question is raised why he makes no mention of Democritus. Neanthes of Cyzicus says that, on his going to Olympia, the eyes of all the Greeks were turned towards him, and there he met Dion, who was about to make his expedition against Dionysius. In the first book of the Memorabilia of Favorinus there is a statement that Mithradates the Persian set up a statue of Plato in the Academy and inscribed upon it these words: Mithradates the Persian, the son of Orontobates, dedicated to the Muses a likeness of Plato made by Silanion.
3.37 Nowhere in his writings does Plato mention himself by name, except in the dialogue On the Soul and the Apology. Aristotle remarks that the style of the dialogues is half-way between poetry and prose. And according to Favorinus, when Plato read the dialogue On the Soul, Aristotle alone stayed to the end; the rest of the audience got up and went away. Some say that Philippus of Opus copied out the Laws, which were left upon waxen tablets, and it is said that he was the author of the Epinomis. Euphorion and Panaetius relate that the beginning of the Republic was found several times revised and rewritten, and the Republic itself Aristoxenus declares to have been nearly all of it included in the Controversies of Protagoras.
9.88 Similarly father and brother are relative terms, day is relative to the sun, and all things relative to our mind. Thus relative terms are in and by themselves unknowable. These, then, are the ten modes of perplexity.But Agrippa and his school add to them five other modes, resulting respectively from disagreement, extension ad infinitum, relativity, hypothesis and reciprocal inference. The mode arising from disagreement proves, with regard to any inquiry whether in philosophy or in everyday life, that it is full of the utmost contentiousness and confusion. The mode which involves extension ad infinitum refuses to admit that what is sought to be proved is firmly established, because one thing furnishes the ground for belief in another, and so on ad infinitum.'' None |
|
13. Origen, Against Celsus, 3.12 (3rd cent. CE - 3rd cent. CE)
Tagged with subjects: • Aristotle, dissension with Plato • Clement of Alexandria, on disagreements between sects
Found in books: Boulluec (2022), The Notion of Heresy in Greek Literature in the Second and Third Centuries, 383; Cohen (2010), The Significance of Yavneh and other Essays in Jewish Hellenism, 546
| sup>
3.12 In the next place, since he reproaches us with the existence of heresies in Christianity as being a ground of accusation against it, saying that when Christians had greatly increased in numbers, they were divided and split up into factions, each individual desiring to have his own party; and further, that being thus separated through their numbers, they confute one another, still having, so to speak, one name in common, if indeed they still retain it. And this is the only thing which they are yet ashamed to abandon, while other matters are determined in different ways by the various sects. In reply to which, we say that heresies of different kinds have never originated from any matter in which the principle involved was not important and beneficial to human life. For since the science of medicine is useful and necessary to the human race, and many are the points of dispute in it respecting the manner of curing bodies, there are found, for this reason, numerous heresies confessedly prevailing in the science of medicine among the Greeks, and also, I suppose, among those barbarous nations who profess to employ medicine. And, again, since philosophy makes a profession of the truth, and promises a knowledge of existing things with a view to the regulation of life, and endeavours to teach what is advantageous to our race, and since the investigation of these matters is attended with great differences of opinion, innumerable heresies have consequently sprung up in philosophy, some of which are more celebrated than others. Even Judaism itself afforded a pretext for the origination of heresies, in the different acceptation accorded to the writings of Moses and those of the prophets. So, then, seeing Christianity appeared an object of veneration to men, not to the more servile class alone, as Celsus supposes, but to many among the Greeks who were devoted to literary pursuits, there necessarily originated heresies - not at all, however, as the result of faction and strife, but through the earnest desire of many literary men to become acquainted with the doctrines of Christianity. The consequence of which was, that, taking in different acceptations those discourses which were believed by all to be divine, there arose heresies, which received their names from those individuals who admired, indeed, the origin of Christianity, but who were led, in some way or other, by certain plausible reasons, to discordant views. And yet no one would act rationally in avoiding medicine because of its heresies; nor would he who aimed at that which is seemly entertain a hatred of philosophy, and adduce its many heresies as a pretext for his antipathy. And so neither are the sacred books of Moses and the prophets to be condemned on account of the heresies in Judaism. '' None |
|
