Home About Network of subjects Linked subjects heatmap Book indices included Search by subject Search by reference Browse subjects Browse texts

Tiresias: The Ancient Mediterranean Religions Source Database

   Search:  
validated results only / all results

and or

Filtering options: (leave empty for all results)
By author:     
By work:        
By subject:
By additional keyword:       



Results for
Please note: the results are produced through a computerized process which may frequently lead to errors, both in incorrect tagging and in other issues. Please use with caution.
Due to load times, full text fetching is currently attempted for validated results only.
Full texts for Hebrew Bible and rabbinic texts is kindly supplied by Sefaria; for Greek and Latin texts, by Perseus Scaife, for the Quran, by Tanzil.net

For a list of book indices included, see here.


graph

graph

All subjects (including unvalidated):
subject book bibliographic info
dinarchus Athanassaki and Titchener, Plutarch's Cities (2022) 183
Gygax, Benefaction and Rewards in the Ancient Greek City: The Origins of Euergetism (2016) 205, 228
Konig and Wiater, Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue (2022) 38, 45
König and Wiater, Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue (2022) 38, 45
Liddel, Decrees of Fourth-Century Athens (403/2-322/1 BC): Volume 2, Political and Cultural Perspectives (2020) 76, 84, 119
Westwood, The Rhetoric of the Past in Demosthenes and Aeschines: Oratory, History, and Politics in Classical Athens (2020) 57, 63, 73, 83, 111, 177, 178, 293
dinarchus, of corinth, orator Amendola, The Demades Papyrus (P.Berol. inv. 13045): A New Text with Commentary (2022) 147, 177, 185, 205, 344, 349
dinarchus, of corinth, politician Amendola, The Demades Papyrus (P.Berol. inv. 13045): A New Text with Commentary (2022) 24, 34, 38, 40, 43, 44, 52, 58, 59, 63, 65, 72, 75, 77, 78, 84, 110, 112, 113, 115, 116, 120, 121, 123, 132, 133, 136, 137, 138, 140, 143, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 157, 160, 161, 167, 169, 174, 184, 185, 188, 194, 196, 201, 202, 207, 208, 209, 211, 315, 318, 334, 337, 338, 343, 347, 348, 349, 351, 354, 355, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 367, 369, 371, 372, 375, 376, 384, 388, 391, 394, 395, 398, 399, 401, 402, 404, 406, 408, 409, 411, 413, 420, 421

List of validated texts:
12 validated results for "dinarchus"
1. Aeschines, Letters, 1.172, 1.175, 1.196, 2.80 (4th cent. BCE - 4th cent. BCE)
 Tagged with subjects: • Dinarchus • Dinarchus of Corinth (orator) • Dinarchus of Corinth (politician) • Dinarchus, attacks Demosthenes

 Found in books: Amendola, The Demades Papyrus (P.Berol. inv. 13045): A New Text with Commentary (2022) 205, 347, 348, 354; Gygax, Benefaction and Rewards in the Ancient Greek City: The Origins of Euergetism (2016) 228; Liddel, Civic Obligation and Individual Liberty in Ancient Athens (2007) 257; Michalopoulos et al., The Rhetoric of Unity and Division in Ancient Literature (2021) 61, 82; Rutter and Sparkes, Word and Image in Ancient Greece (2012) 170

" 1.172 while Demosthenes, getting hold of the money that was to support him in in his banishment, has cheated him out of three talents, and, at the hands of Aristarchus, Nicodemus of Aphidna has met a violent death, poor man! after having had both eyes knocked out, and that tongue cut off with which he had been wont to speak out freely, trusting in the laws and in you.The murdered man, Nicodemus, was a friend and supporter of Demosthenes influential personal and political enemies, Meidias and Eubulus, and had taken part in an unsuccessful attempt to convict Demosthenes of desertion in the Euboean campaign. When he was found murdered, Meidias made repeated attempts to throw suspicion on Demosthenes.",
1.175
So I do beg you by all means not to furnish this sophist with laughter and patronage at your expense. Imagine that you see him when he gets home from the court-room, putting on airs in his lectures to his young men, and telling how successfully he stole the case away from the jury. “I carried the jurors off bodily from the charges brought against Timarchus, and set them on the accuser, and Philip, and the Phocians, and I suspended such terrors before the eyes of the hearers that the defendant began to be the accuser, and the accuser to be on trial; and the jurors forgot what they were to judge; and what they were not to judge, to that they listened.”,
1.196
And now I have fulfilled all my obligation to you: I have explained the laws, I have examined the life of the defendant. Now, therefore, you are judges of my words, and soon I shall be spectator of your acts, for the decision of the case is now left to your judgment. If, therefore, you do what is right and best, we on our part shall, if it be your wish, be able more zealously to call wrongdoers to account.
2.80
You ought, fellow citizens, to judge your ambassadors in the light of the crisis in which they served your generals, in the light of the forces which they commanded. For you set up your statues and you give your seats of honour and your crowns and your dinners in the Prytaneum, not to those who have brought you tidings of peace, but to those who have been victorious in battle. But if the responsibility for the wars is to he laid upon the ambassadors, while the generals are to receive the rewards, the wars you wage will know neither truce nor herald of peace, for no man will be willing to be your ambassador.
2. Demosthenes, Orations, 20.120 (4th cent. BCE - 4th cent. BCE)
 Tagged with subjects: • Dinarchus • Dinarchus of Corinth (politician)

 Found in books: Amendola, The Demades Papyrus (P.Berol. inv. 13045): A New Text with Commentary (2022) 420; Gygax, Benefaction and Rewards in the Ancient Greek City: The Origins of Euergetism (2016) 228

20.120 Now I expect that another argument of Leptines will be that his law does not deprive the recipients of their inscriptions and their free maintece, nor the State of the right to confer honor on those who deserve it, but that it will still be in your power to set up statues and grant maintece and anything else you wish, except this one privilege. But with respect to the powers that he will pretend to leave to the State, I have just this to say. As soon as you take away one of the privileges you have already granted, you will shake the credit of all the rest. For how can the grant of a statue or of free maintece be more indefeasible than that of an immunity, which you will seem to have first given and then taken away?
3. Dinarchus, Or., 1.101 (4th cent. BCE - 3rd cent. BCE)
 Tagged with subjects: • Dinarchus • Dinarchus of Corinth (orator) • Dinarchus of Corinth (politician)

 Found in books: Amendola, The Demades Papyrus (P.Berol. inv. 13045): A New Text with Commentary (2022) 205, 348; Gygax, Benefaction and Rewards in the Ancient Greek City: The Origins of Euergetism (2016) 228; Liddel, Decrees of Fourth-Century Athens (403/2-322/1 BC): Volume 2, Political and Cultural Perspectives (2020) 84

NA>
4. Cicero, De Domo Sua, 124 (2nd cent. BCE - 1st cent. BCE)
 Tagged with subjects: • Dinarchus

 Found in books: Konig and Wiater, Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue (2022) 45; König and Wiater, Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue (2022) 45

venio nunc ad illud nomen aureum Chrysogoni sub quo nomine tota societas latuit latuit Madvig : statuit codd. ; de quo, iudices, neque quo modo dicam neque quo modo taceam reperire possum. si enim taceo, vel maximam partem partem causae Kraffert relinquo; sin autem dico, vereor ne non ille solus, id quod ad me nihil attinet, sed alii quoque plures laesos se laesos se scripsi : laesos se esse codd. ( cf. Zielinski p. 192) putent. tametsi ita se res habet ut mihi in communem causam sectorum dicendum nihil magno opere videatur; haec enim causa nova profecto et singularis est. bonorum Sex. Rosci emptor est Chrysogonus emptor est Chrysogonus w : emptorẽ Chrysogonus ς : emptorem Chrysogonum cett. .
NA>
5. Cicero, De Lege Agraria, 1.26, 3.4 (2nd cent. BCE - 1st cent. BCE)
 Tagged with subjects: • Dinarchus

 Found in books: Konig and Wiater, Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue (2022) 45; König and Wiater, Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue (2022) 45

1.26 The consul states, in full senate, on the calends of January, that if the present condition of the republic continues, and if no new event arises, on account of which he cannot with honour avoid it, he will not go to any province. By that means I shall be able, O conscript fathers, so to behave myself in this magistracy, as to be able to restrain any tribune of the people who is hostile to the republic, — to despise any one who is hostile to myself. 9. Wherefore, in the name of the immortal gods! I entreat you, recollect yourselves, O tribunes of the people; desert those men by whom, in a short time, unless you take great care, you will yourselves be deserted. Conspire with us; agree with all virtuous men defend our common republic with one common zeal and affection. There are many secret wounds sustained by the republic. There are many mischievous counsels of abandoned citizens designed against her. There is no external danger. There is no king no nation, no people in the world whom we need fear. The evil is confined within our own walls internal and domestic very one of us to the best of his power ought to resist and to remedy this.
3.4
The fortieth clause of the law is one, O Romans, the mention of which I have hitherto purposely avoided, lest I should seem to be reopening a wound of the republic which was now scarred over, or to be renewing, at a most unseasonable time, some of our old dissensions. And now too I will argue that point, not because I do not think that this present condition of the republic deserving of being most zealously maintained, especially after I have professed myself to be for this year at least the patron of all tranquillity and uimity in the republic; but in order to teach Rullus for the future to be silent at least in those matters with respect to which he wishes silence to be observed as to himself and his actions.
6. Cicero, On Duties, 1.85 (2nd cent. BCE - 1st cent. BCE)
 Tagged with subjects: • Dinarchus

 Found in books: Konig and Wiater, Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue (2022) 38; König and Wiater, Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue (2022) 38

1.85 Omnino qui rei publicae praefuturi sunt, duo Platonis praecepta teneant, unum, ut utilitatem civium sic tueantur, ut, quaecumque agunt, ad eam referant obliti commodorum suorum, alterum, ut totum corpus rei publicae curent, ne, dum partem aliquam tuentur, reliquas deserant. Ut enim tutela, sic procuratio rei publicae ad eorum utilitatem, qui commissi sunt, non ad eorum, quibus commissa est, gerenda est. Qui autem parti civium consulunt, partem neglegunt, rem perniciosissimam in civitatem inducunt, seditionem atque discordiam; ex quo evenit, ut alii populares, alii studiosi optimi cuiusque videantur, pauci universorum.
" 1.85 Those who propose to take charge of the affairs of government should not fail to remember two of Platos rules: first, to keep the good of the people so clearly in view that regardless of their own interests they will make their every action conform to that; second, to care for the welfare of the whole body politic and not in serving the interests of some one party to betray the rest. For the administration of the government, like the office of a trustee, must be conducted for the benefit of those entrusted to ones care, not of those to whom it is entrusted. Now, those who care for the interests of a part of the citizens and neglect another part, introduce into the civil service a dangerous element âx80x94 dissension and party strife. The result is that some are found to be loyal supporters of the democratic, others of the aristocratic party, and few of the nation as a whole. <"
7. Cicero, Letters, 8.1.1 (2nd cent. BCE - 1st cent. BCE)
 Tagged with subjects: • Dinarchus

 Found in books: Konig and Wiater, Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue (2022) 38; König and Wiater, Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue (2022) 38

NA>
8. Cicero, In Catilinam, 1.31 (2nd cent. BCE - 1st cent. BCE)
 Tagged with subjects: • Dinarchus

 Found in books: Konig and Wiater, Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue (2022) 45; König and Wiater, Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue (2022) 45

NA>
9. Cicero, Philippicae, 8.15-8.16 (2nd cent. BCE - 1st cent. BCE)
 Tagged with subjects: • Dinarchus

 Found in books: Konig and Wiater, Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue (2022) 38; König and Wiater, Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue (2022) 38

8.15 Let us come to instances nearer our own time. The senate entrusted the defense of the republic to Caius Marius and Lucius Valerius the consuls. Lucius Saturninus, a tribune of the people, and Caius Glaucia the praetor, were slain. On that day, all the Scauri, and Metelli, and Claudii, and Catuli, and Scaevolae, and Crassi took arms. Do you think either those consuls or those other most illustrious men deserving of blame? I myself wished Catiline to perish. Did you who wish every one to be safe, wish Catiline to be safe? There is this difference, O Calenus, between my opinion and yours. I wish no citizen to commit such crimes as deserve to be punished with death. You think that, even if he has committed them, still he ought to be saved. If there is any thing in our own body which is injurious to the rest of the body, we allow that to be burned and cut out, in order that a limb may be lost in preference to the whole body. And so in the body of the republic, whatever is rotten must be cut off in order that the whole may be saved. 8.16 Harsh language! This is much more harsh, “Let the worthless, and wicked, and impious be saved; let the innocent, the honorable, the virtuous, the whole republic be destroyed.” In the case of one individual, O Quintus Fufius, I confess that you saw more than I did. I thought Publius Clodius a mischievous, wicked, lustful, impious, audacious, criminal citizen. You, on the other hand, called him religious, temperate, innocent, modest; a citizen to be preserved and desired. In this one particular I admit that you had great discernment, and that I made a great mistake. For as for your saying that I am in the habit of arguing against you with ill temper, that is not the case. I confess that I argue with vehemence, but not with ill temper. I am not in the habit of getting angry with my friends every now and then, not even if they deserve it.
10. Cicero, Pro Lege Manilia, 17 (2nd cent. BCE - 1st cent. BCE)
 Tagged with subjects: • Dinarchus

 Found in books: Konig and Wiater, Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue (2022) 45; König and Wiater, Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue (2022) 45

17 esset hoc tempore, tamen ad tantum bellum is erat deligendus deligendus adigendus T atque mittendus; nunc cum ad ceteras summas utilitates haec quoque opportunitas adiungatur ut in eis eis om. H ipsis locis adsit, ut habeat exercitum, ut ab eis qui habent accipere statim possit, quid exspectamus? aut cur cur quid H non ducibus dis immortalibus eidem cui cetera summa cum salute rei publicae commissa sunt hoc quoque bellum regium commendamus commendamus H : committamus (-imus y1 ) cett. ?
17 50 But, if Cnaeus Pompeius were a private individual at Rome at this present time, still he would be the man who ought to be selected and sent out to so great a war. But now, when to all the other exceeding advantages of the appointment, this opportunity is also added — that he is in those very countries already — that he has an army with him — that there is another army there which can at once be made over to him by those who are in command of it — why do we delay? or why do we not, under the guidance of the immortal gods themselves, commit this royal war also to him to whom all the other wars in those parts have been already entrusted to the greatest advantage, to the very safety of the republic? 51But, to be sure, that most illustrious man, Quintus Catulus, a man most honestly attached to the republic, and loaded with your kindness in a way most honourable to him; and also Quintus Hortensius, a man endowed with the highest qualities of honour, and fortune, and virtue, and genius, disagree to this proposal. And I admit that their authority has in many instances had the greatest weight with you, and that it ought to have the greatest weight; but in this cause, although you are aware that the opinions of many very brave and illustrious men are unfavourable to us, still it is possible for us, disregarding those authorities, to arrive at the truth by the circumstances of the case and by reason. And so much the more easily, because those very men admit that everything which has been said by me up to this time is true — that the war is necessary, that it is an important war, and that all the requisite qualifications are in the highest perfection in Cnaeus Pompeius. 52 What, then, does Hortensius say? “That if the whole power must be given to one man, Pompeius alone is most worthy to have it, but that, nevertheless, the power ought not to be entrusted to one individual.” That argument, however, has now become obsolete, having been refuted much more by facts than by words. For you, also, Quintus Hortensius, said many things with great force and fluency (as might be expected from your exceeding ability, and eminent facility as an orator) in the senate against that brave man, Aulus Gabinius, when he had brought forward the law about appointing one commander-in-chief against the pirates; and also from this place where I now stand, you made a long speech against that law. 53 What then? By the immortal gods, if your authority had had greater weight with the Roman people than the safety and real interests of the Roman people itself, should we have been this day in possession of our present glory, and of the empire of the whole earth? Did this, then, appear to you to be dominion, when it was a common thing for the ambassadors, and praetors, and quaestors of the Roman people to be taken prisoners? when we were cut off from all supplies, both public and private, from all our provinces? when all the seas were so closed against us, that we could neither visit any private estate of our own, nor any public domain beyond the sea?
11. Pausanias, Description of Greece, 1.8.3 (2nd cent. CE - 2nd cent. CE)
 Tagged with subjects: • Dinarchus • Dinarchus of Corinth (politician)

 Found in books: Amendola, The Demades Papyrus (P.Berol. inv. 13045): A New Text with Commentary (2022) 157; Westwood, The Rhetoric of the Past in Demosthenes and Aeschines: Oratory, History, and Politics in Classical Athens (2020) 73

1.8.3 Δημοσθένης δέ ὡς τὸ δεύτερον ἔφυγε, περαιοῦται καὶ τότε ἐς τὴν Καλαυρείαν, ἔνθα δὴ πιὼν φάρμακον ἐτελεύτησεν· φυγάδα τε Ἕλληνα μόνον τοῦτον Ἀντιπάτρῳ καὶ Μακεδόσιν οὐκ ἀνήγαγεν Ἀρχίας. ὁ δὲ Ἀρχίας οὗτος Θούριος ὢν ἔργον ἤρατο ἀνόσιον· ὅσοι Μακεδόσιν ἔπραξαν ἐναντία πρὶν ἢ τοῖς Ἕλλησι τὸ πταῖσμα τὸ ἐν Θεσσαλίᾳ γενέσθαι, τούτους ἦγεν Ἀρχίας Ἀντιπάτρῳ δώσοντας δίκην. Δημοσθένει μὲν ἡ πρὸς Ἀθηναίους ἄγαν εὔνοια ἐς τοῦτο ἐχώρησεν· εὖ δέ μοι λελέχθαι δοκεῖ ἄνδρα ἀφειδῶς ἐκπεσόντα ἐς πολιτείαν καὶ πιστὰ ἡγησάμενον τὰ τοῦ δήμου μήποτε καλῶς τελευτῆσαι.
" 1.8.3 Exiled for the second time 323 B.C. Demosthenes crossed once more to Calauria, and committed suicide there by taking poison, being the only Greek exile whom Archias failed to bring back to Antipater and the Macedonians. This Archias was a Thurian who undertook the abominable task of bringing to Antipater for punishment those who had opposed the Macedonians before the Greeks met with their defeat in Thessaly . Such was Demosthenes reward for his great devotion to Athens . I heartily agree with the remark that no man who has unsparingly thrown himself into politics trusting in the loyalty of the democracy has ever met with a happy death."
12. Aeschines, Or., 1.172, 1.175, 1.196, 2.80
 Tagged with subjects: • Dinarchus • Dinarchus of Corinth (orator) • Dinarchus of Corinth (politician) • Dinarchus, attacks Demosthenes

 Found in books: Amendola, The Demades Papyrus (P.Berol. inv. 13045): A New Text with Commentary (2022) 205, 347, 348, 354; Gygax, Benefaction and Rewards in the Ancient Greek City: The Origins of Euergetism (2016) 228; Liddel, Civic Obligation and Individual Liberty in Ancient Athens (2007) 257; Michalopoulos et al., The Rhetoric of Unity and Division in Ancient Literature (2021) 61, 82; Rutter and Sparkes, Word and Image in Ancient Greece (2012) 170

" 1.172 while Demosthenes, getting hold of the money that was to support him in in his banishment, has cheated him out of three talents, and, at the hands of Aristarchus, Nicodemus of Aphidna has met a violent death, poor man! after having had both eyes knocked out, and that tongue cut off with which he had been wont to speak out freely, trusting in the laws and in you.The murdered man, Nicodemus, was a friend and supporter of Demosthenes influential personal and political enemies, Meidias and Eubulus, and had taken part in an unsuccessful attempt to convict Demosthenes of desertion in the Euboean campaign. When he was found murdered, Meidias made repeated attempts to throw suspicion on Demosthenes.",
1.175
So I do beg you by all means not to furnish this sophist with laughter and patronage at your expense. Imagine that you see him when he gets home from the court-room, putting on airs in his lectures to his young men, and telling how successfully he stole the case away from the jury. “I carried the jurors off bodily from the charges brought against Timarchus, and set them on the accuser, and Philip, and the Phocians, and I suspended such terrors before the eyes of the hearers that the defendant began to be the accuser, and the accuser to be on trial; and the jurors forgot what they were to judge; and what they were not to judge, to that they listened.”,
1.196
And now I have fulfilled all my obligation to you: I have explained the laws, I have examined the life of the defendant. Now, therefore, you are judges of my words, and soon I shall be spectator of your acts, for the decision of the case is now left to your judgment. If, therefore, you do what is right and best, we on our part shall, if it be your wish, be able more zealously to call wrongdoers to account.
2.80
You ought, fellow citizens, to judge your ambassadors in the light of the crisis in which they served your generals, in the light of the forces which they commanded. For you set up your statues and you give your seats of honour and your crowns and your dinners in the Prytaneum, not to those who have brought you tidings of peace, but to those who have been victorious in battle. But if the responsibility for the wars is to he laid upon the ambassadors, while the generals are to receive the rewards, the wars you wage will know neither truce nor herald of peace, for no man will be willing to be your ambassador.



Please note: the results are produced through a computerized process which may frequently lead to errors, both in incorrect tagging and in other issues. Please use with caution.
Due to load times, full text fetching is currently attempted for validated results only.
Full texts for Hebrew Bible and rabbinic texts is kindly supplied by Sefaria; for Greek and Latin texts, by Perseus Scaife, for the Quran, by Tanzil.net

For a list of book indices included, see here.