Home About Network of subjects Linked subjects heatmap Book indices included Search by subject Search by reference Browse subjects Browse texts

Tiresias: The Ancient Mediterranean Religions Source Database

   Search:  
validated results only / all results

and or

Filtering options: (leave empty for all results)
By author:     
By work:        
By subject:
By additional keyword:       



Results for
Please note: the results are produced through a computerized process which may frequently lead to errors, both in incorrect tagging and in other issues. Please use with caution.
Due to load times, full text fetching is currently attempted for validated results only.
Full texts for Hebrew Bible and rabbinic texts is kindly supplied by Sefaria; for Greek and Latin texts, by Perseus Scaife, for the Quran, by Tanzil.net

For a list of book indices included, see here.


graph

graph

All subjects (including unvalidated):
subject book bibliographic info
approach, abduction marriage, christian Monnickendam (2020) 38, 131
approach, adultery, christian Monnickendam (2020) 166
approach, and advise men, biblical women Gera (2014) 350, 371, 411
approach, and paganism, philosophers Sider (2001) 67, 74
approach, architecture and art, aesthetic Jenkyns (2013) 311, 314, 315, 316, 317, 319, 334, 337, 353
approach, art and architecture, aesthetic Jenkyns (2013) 311, 314, 315, 316, 317, 319, 334, 337, 353
approach, as compared with that in the war, antiquities of josephus, different historiographical Feldman (2006) 323
approach, beasts, the, and hybrid Sneed (2022) 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233
approach, bio-ritual model Pinheiro Bierl and Beck (2013) 91
approach, body-environment, bea Nuno et al (2021) 7, 66, 67
approach, body-environment, bea, in lucretius’ epicurean theory of sight Nuno et al (2021) 7, 37, 38, 39, 40, 54, 55, 57, 66, 67
approach, body-environment, bea, in magic Nuno et al (2021) 90, 92, 94, 95
approach, cognitive Kingsley Monti and Rood (2022) 217, 222
approach, comparative Gabrielsen and Paganini (2021) 2, 23, 78, 81, 235, 238, 239
Huebner (2013) 1, 16, 75, 150, 165, 171
approach, early greek epistemology, requiring an interdisciplinary Tor (2017) 9, 346
approach, egyptian, allegorical Griffiths (1975) 28
approach, ground-up Czajkowski et al (2020) 115, 418, 463, 479
approach, history-of-religion method in author's Peppard (2011) 28
approach, in a monograph, callisthenes, historian, author of phocian war, illustrates tragic Feldman (2006) 347
approach, inheritance, bavli Lavee (2017) 160
approach, interdisciplinary Bacchi (2022) 133, 146, 147, 148
approach, issues with, historicizing Pierce et al. (2022) 161
approach, modern scholarship on divine sonship nicene Peppard (2011) 10, 11, 12, 28
approach, on the contemplative life, taylors contextual Kraemer (2010) 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
approach, performative Simon-Shushan (2012) 99, 129
approach, permanent, value-judgment Gardner (2015) 56, 62, 89
approach, polytheism structuralist Parker (2005) 389, 391, 392, 393, 395
approach, poverty, biological Gardner (2015) 56, 62, 85, 88, 91, 184
approach, rabbinic literature, documentary Lavee (2017) 6, 17
approach, religious violence, religious studies Dijkstra and Raschle (2020) 20, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 32, 34, 35, 38, 39, 43
approach, ritual, individualistic Bull Lied and Turner (2011) 503
approach, statements, casuistic, if/then, “steady decline” Simon-Shushan (2012) 200, 201
approach, stories, didactic, “steady decline” Simon-Shushan (2012) 200, 201
approach, synchronic Faraone (1999) 32, 37
approach, taylor, j. e., on the contemplative life, contextual Kraemer (2010) 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
approach, to art and architecture, aesthetic Jenkyns (2013) 311, 314, 315, 316, 317, 319, 334, 337, 353
approach, to art and architecture, ideological Jenkyns (2013) 311, 317, 334, 353
approach, to art and architecture, political Jenkyns (2013) 311, 317, 334, 353
approach, to cognitive, greek, religion Versnel (2011) 542, 557, 558
approach, to exegesis, midrash, atomistic Stern (2004) 83, 84, 90
approach, to fasting of babylonian rabbis and, palestinian rabbis, sages Kalmin (1998) 11
approach, to fasting of palestinian rabbis, babylonian rabbis, sages Kalmin (1998) 11
approach, to hebrew scriptures, augustine of hippo, philosophical Ashbrook Harvey et al (2015) 93
approach, to lexical meaning, maximalist Peels (2016) 15, 22
approach, to lexical meaning, maximalist meaning, theory of Peels (2016) 15, 22, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154
approach, to lexical meaning, monosemous Peels (2016) 15
approach, to medicine, empirical method van der EIjk (2005) 123
approach, to rabbis concerning conversion, non-jews Lavee (2017) 121, 127, 132, 188
approach, to religious allegiance, libanius, flexible König (2012) 196
approach, to song of songs in song of songs piyyutim, allegorical Lieber (2014) 57
approach, to text, allegorical reading of biblical law, leviticus rabba, hellenistic/christian Hayes (2022) 142, 146, 151, 157, 158
approach, to the mishnah, abaye exegetical Rosen-Zvi (2012) 93
approach, to the mishnah, rava exegetical Rosen-Zvi (2012) 93
approach, to, astrometeorology, augustus Green (2014) 2, 11, 72, 102, 103, 104
approach, to, document burial and preservation, sadducees Taylor (2012) 294
approach, to, scripture Taylor (2012) 294
approach, to, sources, historiographical Morrison (2020) 13, 33, 42, 43, 44, 45, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 55, 56, 58, 59, 60, 66, 68, 69, 70, 71, 78, 79, 80, 94, 101, 105, 106, 118, 214
approach, to, typology, postmodern Dawson (2001) 221
approach, truth, philosophers Sider (2001) 67
approach, truth, poets Sider (2001) 67
approached, and worshipped in gods, above and below, initiation, generous providence of Griffiths (1975) 341
approached, and worshipped in gods, above and below, initiation, new and strange plan of Griffiths (1975) 29
approached, and worshipped in gods, above and below, initiation, they honour isis Griffiths (1975) 322
approached, and worshipped in gods, above and below, initiation, think lucius worthy Griffiths (1975) 29, 339
approached, and worshipped in gods, above and below, initiation, unexpected and marvellous commands of Griffiths (1975) 29
approached, and worshipped in initiation, gods, above and below Griffiths (1975) 306
approached, by consul without lictors, dictator Konrad (2022) 66, 67, 82, 95, 96, 97, 98
approached, historiography as a follower of polybius rather than of livy, josephus Feldman (2006) 211
approached, in initiation, death, prayed for, boundary of death Griffiths (1975) 296
approaches, cognitive Williamson (2021) 61
approaches, distinguished, elijah, babylonian, palestinian Kalmin (1998) 18
approaches, essentialist Vlassopoulos (2021) 164, 193
approaches, evaluating qualitative parallels, methodological Dürr (2022) 30
approaches, frontiers of apatheia, evagrius, desert father, but this only Sorabji (2000) 361, 395
approaches, genealogy, rabbinic to, babylonian rabbis preoccupation with Kalmin (1998) 16, 36, 46, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
approaches, genealogy, rabbinic to, in tobit Kalmin (1998) 135
approaches, genealogy, rabbinic to, of palestinian rabbis Kalmin (1998) 16, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
approaches, genealogy, rabbinic to, theme of ezras purity of lineage Kalmin (1998) 16, 121, 122
approaches, in de abrahamo, exegetical Birnbaum and Dillon (2020) 30
approaches, mahozan vs. pumbeditan Schick (2021) 49, 95, 97
approaches, network Jim (2022) 140
approaches, of babylonian david, king, diverse rabbis, palestinian rabbis Kalmin (1998) 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 92
approaches, of babylonian moses, rabbis, palestinian rabbis compared Kalmin (1998) 94
approaches, of babylonian non-rabbinic jews, rabbis, palestinian rabbis distinguished Kalmin (1998) 30
approaches, of entangled, histoire history, methodological croisée Stavrianopoulou (2013) 11, 27
approaches, reader-response Morrison (2020) 108
approaches, social, mistaken Galinsky (2016) 348
approaches, spatial Williamson (2021) 57
approaches, static Vlassopoulos (2021) 192
approaches, to amoraim, charity, expanded charity Gardner (2015) 189
approaches, to amoraim, charity, interest in tamhui Gardner (2015) 181, 182, 183
approaches, to diachronic vs. synchronic, greek, religion Kowalzig (2007) 20, 21, 23, 78
approaches, to eating and drinking, anthropological König (2012) 123
approaches, to in scholarship, josephus Noam (2018) 13, 15
approaches, to myth, rationalising Konig (2022) 49, 52, 56, 57, 58, 66, 67, 111, 112, 113, 330, 332
Morrison (2020) 53, 71, 76
approaches, to poverty and charity, christianity Gardner (2015) 6, 9, 152, 191
approaches, to practicing medicine, incubation, christian, saints different Renberg (2017) 790, 791
approaches, to study of aggadic midrash, aggadic stories Hayes (2022) 553
approaches, to, foundation myths, academic Sweeney (2013) 9, 13, 41
approaches, to, literacy, scholarly Bruun and Edmondson (2015) 754, 756, 757, 758
approaches, to, modern Fishbane (2003) 4, 7, 8, 31
approaches, to, necessity, in thucydides, scholarly Joho (2022) 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
approaches, to, paganism Davies (2004) 96, 228, 232
approaches, to, parallels, inner-rabbinic, literary/cultural vs. historical Hayes (2022) 224, 225, 226, 254, 255, 259, 260, 378
approaches, to, religio, religio, ritual Davies (2004) 4, 5, 7, 9, 23, 59, 79
approaches, to, religion, greek, cognitive Tor (2017) 41
approaches, to, temporality Beyerle and Goff (2022) 35, 73, 230, 300, 324, 333
approaches, torah, study of to, of non-rabbinic jews to Kalmin (1998) 40, 95
approaches, traditionsgeschichtlich, methodological Dürr (2022) 2, 3
approaching, catastrophe, dramatic effects, in the gospel of judas, visions of Scopello (2008) 24, 25, 26
approaching, food, epictetus, stoic, do not project your desire to Sorabji (2000) 216

List of validated texts:
6 validated results for "approach"
1. Septuagint, Tobit, 5.10 (th cent. BCE - 2nd cent. BCE)
 Tagged with subjects: • Temporality, Approaches to • genealogy, rabbinic approaches to, in Tobit

 Found in books: Beyerle and Goff (2022) 300; Kalmin (1998) 135


5.10. Then Tobit said to him, "My brother, to what tribe and family do you belong? Tell me. "''. None
2. Hebrew Bible, Isaiah, 40.9, 52.7 (8th cent. BCE - 5th cent. BCE)
 Tagged with subjects: • midrash, atomistic approach to exegesis • rationalising approaches to myth

 Found in books: Konig (2022) 332; Stern (2004) 90


40.9. עַל הַר־גָּבֹהַ עֲלִי־לָךְ מְבַשֶּׂרֶת צִיּוֹן הָרִימִי בַכֹּחַ קוֹלֵךְ מְבַשֶּׂרֶת יְרוּשָׁלִָם הָרִימִי אַל־תִּירָאִי אִמְרִי לְעָרֵי יְהוּדָה הִנֵּה אֱלֹהֵיכֶם׃
52.7. מַה־נָּאווּ עַל־הֶהָרִים רַגְלֵי מְבַשֵּׂר מַשְׁמִיעַ שָׁלוֹם מְבַשֵּׂר טוֹב מַשְׁמִיעַ יְשׁוּעָה אֹמֵר לְצִיּוֹן מָלַךְ אֱלֹהָיִךְ׃''. None
40.9. O thou that tellest good tidings to Zion, Get thee up into the high mountain; O thou that tellest good tidings to Jerusalem, Lift up thy voice with strength; Lift it up, be not afraid; Say unto the cities of Judah: ‘Behold your God! ’
52.7. How beautiful upon the mountains Are the feet of the messenger of good tidings, That announceth peace, the harbinger of good tidings, That announceth salvation; That saith unto Zion: ‘Thy God reigneth! ’''. None
3. Thucydides, The History of The Peloponnesian War, 8.40.2 (5th cent. BCE - 4th cent. BCE)
 Tagged with subjects: • Approaches, Static • Necessity (in Thucydides), scholarly approaches to

 Found in books: Joho (2022) 22; Vlassopoulos (2021) 192


8.40.2. οἱ γὰρ οἰκέται τοῖς Χίοις πολλοὶ ὄντες καὶ μιᾷ γε πόλει πλὴν Λακεδαιμονίων πλεῖστοι γενόμενοι καὶ ἅμα διὰ τὸ πλῆθος χαλεπωτέρως ἐν ταῖς ἀδικίαις κολαζόμενοι, ὡς ἡ στρατιὰ τῶν Ἀθηναίων βεβαίως ἔδοξε μετὰ τείχους ἱδρῦσθαι, εὐθὺς αὐτομολίᾳ τε ἐχώρησαν οἱ πολλοὶ πρὸς αὐτοὺς καὶ τὰ πλεῖστα κακὰ ἐπιστάμενοι τὴν χώραν οὗτοι ἔδρασαν.''. None
8.40.2. There were more slaves at Chios than in any one other city except Lacedaemon, and being also by reason of their numbers punished more rigorously when they offended, most of them when they saw the Athenian armament firmly established in the island with a fortified position, immediately deserted to the enemy, and through their knowledge of the country did the greatest mischief. ''. None
4. Josephus Flavius, Jewish Antiquities, 1.156 (1st cent. CE - 1st cent. CE)
 Tagged with subjects: • Antiquities of Josephus, different historiographical approach as compared with that in the War • Josephus, approaches to in scholarship

 Found in books: Feldman (2006) 323; Noam (2018) 15


1.156. εἰκάζεται δὲ ταῦτα τοῖς γῆς καὶ θαλάσσης παθήμασι τοῖς τε περὶ τὸν ἥλιον καὶ τὴν σελήνην καὶ πᾶσι τοῖς κατ' οὐρανὸν συμβαίνουσι: δυνάμεως γὰρ αὐτοῖς παρούσης καὶ προνοῆσαι τῆς κατ' αὐτοὺς εὐταξίας, ταύτης δ' ὑστεροῦντας φανεροὺς γίνεσθαι μηδ' ὅσα πρὸς τὸ χρησιμώτερον ἡμῖν συνεργοῦσι κατὰ τὴν αὐτῶν ἐξουσίαν, ἀλλὰ κατὰ τὴν τοῦ κελεύοντος ἰσχὺν ὑπουργεῖν, ᾧ καλῶς ἔχει μόνῳ τὴν τιμὴν καὶ τὴν εὐχαριστίαν ἀπονέμειν."". None
1.156. This his opinion was derived from the irregular phenomena that were visible both at land and sea, as well as those that happen to the sun, and moon, and all the heavenly bodies, thus:—“If said he these bodies had power of their own, they would certainly take care of their own regular motions; but since they do not preserve such regularity, they make it plain, that in so far as they co-operate to our advantage, they do it not of their own abilities, but as they are subservient to Him that commands them, to whom alone we ought justly to offer our honor and thanksgiving.”''. None
5. None, None, nan (2nd cent. CE - 5th cent. CE)
 Tagged with subjects: • Christianity, approaches to poverty and charity • non-rabbinic Jews, approaches of Babylonian rabbis, Palestinian rabbis distinguished

 Found in books: Gardner (2015) 9; Kalmin (1998) 30


6. Babylonian Talmud, Niddah, None (3rd cent. CE - 6th cent. CE)
 Tagged with subjects: • Monotheism, dualist approach versus Jewish • On the Contemplative Life, Taylors contextual approach • Taylor, J. E., On the Contemplative Life, contextual approach

 Found in books: Kosman (2012) 193; Kraemer (2010) 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73


31a. מאי קרא (תהלים עא, ו) ממעי אמי אתה גוזי מאי משמע דהאי גוזי לישנא דאשתבועי הוא דכתיב (ירמיהו ז, כט) גזי נזרך והשליכי,ואמר רבי אלעזר למה ולד דומה במעי אמו לאגוז מונח בספל של מים אדם נותן אצבעו עליו שוקע לכאן ולכאן,תנו רבנן שלשה חדשים הראשונים ולד דר במדור התחתון אמצעיים ולד דר במדור האמצעי אחרונים ולד דר במדור העליון וכיון שהגיע זמנו לצאת מתהפך ויוצא וזהו חבלי אשה,והיינו דתנן חבלי של נקבה מרובין משל זכר,ואמר רבי אלעזר מאי קרא (תהלים קלט, טו) אשר עשיתי בסתר רקמתי בתחתיות ארץ דרתי לא נאמר אלא רקמתי,מאי שנא חבלי נקבה מרובין משל זכר זה בא כדרך תשמישו וזה בא כדרך תשמישו זו הופכת פניה וזה אין הופך פניו,תנו רבנן שלשה חדשים הראשונים תשמיש קשה לאשה וגם קשה לולד אמצעיים קשה לאשה ויפה לולד אחרונים יפה לאשה ויפה לולד שמתוך כך נמצא הולד מלובן ומזורז,תנא המשמש מטתו ליום תשעים כאילו שופך דמים מנא ידע אלא אמר אביי משמש והולך (תהלים קטז, ו) ושומר פתאים ה\',תנו רבנן שלשה שותפין יש באדם הקב"ה ואביו ואמו אביו מזריע הלובן שממנו עצמות וגידים וצפרנים ומוח שבראשו ולובן שבעין אמו מזרעת אודם שממנו עור ובשר ושערות ושחור שבעין והקב"ה נותן בו רוח ונשמה וקלסתר פנים וראיית העין ושמיעת האוזן ודבור פה והלוך רגלים ובינה והשכל,וכיון שהגיע זמנו להפטר מן העולם הקב"ה נוטל חלקו וחלק אביו ואמו מניח לפניהם אמר רב פפא היינו דאמרי אינשי פוץ מלחא ושדי בשרא לכלבא,דרש רב חיננא בר פפא מאי דכתיב (איוב ט, י) עושה גדולות עד אין חקר ונפלאות עד אין מספר בא וראה שלא כמדת הקב"ה מדת בשר ודם מדת בשר ודם נותן חפץ בחמת צרורה ופיה למעלה ספק משתמר ספק אין משתמר ואילו הקב"ה צר העובר במעי אשה פתוחה ופיה למטה ומשתמר,דבר אחר אדם נותן חפציו לכף מאזנים כל זמן שמכביד יורד למטה ואילו הקב"ה כל זמן שמכביד הולד עולה למעלה,דרש רבי יוסי הגלילי מאי דכתיב {תהילים קל״ט:י״ד } אודך (ה\') על כי נוראות נפליתי נפלאים מעשיך ונפשי יודעת מאד בא וראה שלא כמדת הקב"ה מדת בשר ודם מדת בשר ודם אדם נותן זרעונים בערוגה כל אחת ואחת עולה במינו ואילו הקב"ה צר העובר במעי אשה וכולם עולין למין אחד,דבר אחר צבע נותן סמנין ליורה כולן עולין לצבע אחד ואילו הקב"ה צר העובר במעי אשה כל אחת ואחת עולה למינו,דרש רב יוסף מאי דכתיב (ישעיהו יב, א) אודך ה\' כי אנפת בי ישוב אפך ותנחמני במה הכתוב מדבר,בשני בני אדם שיצאו לסחורה ישב לו קוץ לאחד מהן התחיל מחרף ומגדף לימים שמע שטבעה ספינתו של חבירו בים התחיל מודה ומשבח לכך נאמר ישוב אפך ותנחמני,והיינו דאמר רבי אלעזר מאי דכתיב (תהלים עב, יח) עושה נפלאות (גדולות) לבדו וברוך שם כבודו לעולם אפילו בעל הנס אינו מכיר בנסו,דריש רבי חנינא בר פפא מאי דכתיב (תהלים קלט, ג) ארחי ורבעי זרית וכל דרכי הסכנת מלמד שלא נוצר אדם מן כל הטפה אלא מן הברור שבה תנא דבי רבי ישמעאל משל לאדם שזורה בבית הגרנות נוטל את האוכל ומניח את הפסולת,כדרבי אבהו דרבי אבהו רמי כתיב (שמואל ב כב, מ) ותזרני חיל וכתיב (תהלים יח, לג) האל המאזרני חיל אמר דוד לפני הקב"ה רבש"ע זיריתני וזרזתני,דרש רבי אבהו מאי דכתיב (במדבר כג, י) מי מנה עפר יעקב ומספר את רובע ישראל מלמד שהקב"ה יושב וסופר את רביעיותיהם של ישראל מתי תבא טיפה שהצדיק נוצר הימנה,ועל דבר זה נסמית עינו של בלעם הרשע אמר מי שהוא טהור וקדוש ומשרתיו טהורים וקדושים יציץ בדבר זה מיד נסמית עינו דכתיב (במדבר כד, ג) נאם הגבר שתום העין,והיינו דאמר רבי יוחנן מאי דכתיב (בראשית ל, טז) וישכב עמה בלילה הוא מלמד שהקב"ה סייע באותו מעשה שנאמר (בראשית מט, יד) יששכר חמור גרם חמור גרם לו ליששכר,אמר רבי יצחק אמר רבי אמי אשה מזרעת תחילה יולדת זכר איש מזריע תחילה יולדת נקבה שנאמר (ויקרא יג, כט) אשה כי תזריע וילדה זכר,תנו רבנן בראשונה היו אומרים אשה מזרעת תחילה יולדת זכר איש מזריע תחלה יולדת נקבה ולא פירשו חכמים את הדבר עד שבא רבי צדוק ופירשו (בראשית מו, טו) אלה בני לאה אשר ילדה ליעקב בפדן ארם ואת דינה בתו תלה הזכרים בנקבות ונקבות בזכרים,(דברי הימים א ח, מ) ויהיו בני אולם אנשים גבורי חיל דורכי קשת ומרבים בנים ובני בנים וכי בידו של אדם להרבות בנים ובני בנים אלא מתוך''. None
31a. What is the verse from which it is derived that a fetus is administered an oath on the day of its birth? “Upon You I have relied from birth; You are He Who took me out gozi of my mother’s womb” (Psalms 71:6). From where may it be inferred that this word: Gozi,” is a term of administering an oath? As it is written: “Cut off gozi your hair and cast it away” (Jeremiah 7:29), which is interpreted as a reference to the vow of a nazirite, who must cut off his hair at the end of his term of naziriteship.,And Rabbi Elazar says: To what is a fetus in its mother’s womb comparable? It is comparable to a nut placed in a basin full of water, floating on top of the water. If a person puts his finger on top of the nut, it sinks either in this direction or in that direction.The Sages taught in a baraita: During the first three months of pregcy, the fetus resides in the lower compartment of the womb; in the middle three months, the fetus resides in the middle compartment; and during the last three months of pregcy the fetus resides in the upper compartment. And once its time to emerge arrives, it turns upside down and emerges; and this is what causes labor pains.,With regard to the assertion that labor pains are caused by the fetus turning upside down, the Gemara notes: And this is the explanation for that which we learned in a baraita: The labor pains experienced by a woman who gives birth to a female are greater than those experienced by a woman who gives birth to a male. The Gemara will explain this below.,And Rabbi Elazar says: What is the verse from which it is derived that a fetus initially resides in the lower part of the womb? “When I was made in secret, and I was woven together in the lowest parts of the earth” (Psalms 139:15). Since it is not stated: I resided in the lowest parts of the earth, but rather: “I was woven together in the lowest parts of the earth,” this teaches that during the initial stage of a fetus’s development, when it is woven together, its location is in the lower compartment of the womb.,The Gemara asks: What is different about the labor pains experienced by a woman who gives birth to a female, that they are greater than those experienced by a woman who gives birth to a male? The Gemara answers: This one, a male fetus, emerges in the manner in which it engages in intercourse. Just as a male engages in intercourse facing downward, so too, it is born while facing down. And that one, a female fetus, emerges in the manner in which it engages in intercourse, i.e., facing upward. Consequently, that one, a female fetus, turns its face around before it is born, but this one, a male fetus, does not turn its face around before it is born.,§ The Sages taught in a baraita: During the first three months of pregcy, sexual intercourse is difficult and harmful for the woman and is also difficult for the offspring. During the middle three months, intercourse is difficult for the woman but is beneficial for the offspring. During the last three months, sexual intercourse is beneficial for the woman and beneficial for the offspring; as a result of it the offspring is found to be strong and fair skinned.,The Sages taught in a baraita: With regard to one who engages in intercourse with his wife on the ninetieth day of her pregcy, it is as though he spills her blood. The Gemara asks: How does one know that it is the ninetieth day of her pregcy? Rather, Abaye says: One should go ahead and engage in intercourse with his wife even if it might be the ninetieth day, and rely on God to prevent any ensuing harm, as the verse states: “The Lord preserves the simple” (Psalms 116:6).,§ The Sages taught: There are three partners in the creation of a person: The Holy One, Blessed be He, and his father, and his mother. His father emits the white seed, from which the following body parts are formed: The bones, the sinews, the nails, the brain that is in its head, and the white of the eye. His mother emits red seed, from which are formed the skin, the flesh, the hair, and the black of the eye. And the Holy One, Blessed be He, inserts into him a spirit, a soul, his countece ukelaster, eyesight, hearing of the ear, the capability of speech of the mouth, the capability of walking with the legs, understanding, and wisdom.,And when a person’s time to depart from the world arrives, the Holy One, Blessed be He, retrieves His part, and He leaves the part of the person’s father and mother before them. Rav Pappa said: This is in accordance with the adage that people say: Remove the salt from a piece of meat, and you may then toss the meat to a dog, as it has become worthless.,§ Rav Ḥina bar Pappa taught: What is the meaning of that which is written: “Who does great deeds beyond comprehension, wondrous deeds without number” (Job 9:10)? Come and see that the attribute of flesh and blood is unlike the attribute of the Holy One, Blessed be He. The attribute of flesh and blood is that if one puts an article in a flask, even if the flask is tied and its opening faces upward, it is uncertain whether the item is preserved from getting lost, and it is uncertain whether it is not preserved from being lost. But the Holy One, Blessed be He, forms the fetus in a woman’s open womb, and its opening faces downward, and yet the fetus is preserved.,Another matter that demonstrates the difference between the attributes of God and the attributes of people is that when a person places his articles on a scale to be measured, the heavier the item is, the more it descends. But when the Holy One, Blessed be He, forms a fetus, the heavier the offspring gets, the more it ascends upward in the womb.,Rabbi Yosei HaGelili taught: What is the meaning of that which is written: “I will give thanks to You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made; wonderful are Your works, and that my soul knows very well” (Psalms 139:14)? Come and see that the attribute of flesh and blood is unlike the attribute of the Holy One, Blessed be He. The attribute of flesh and blood is that when a person plants seeds of different species in one garden bed, each and every one of the seeds emerges as a grown plant according to its species. But the Holy One, Blessed be He, forms the fetus in a woman’s womb, and all of the seeds, i.e., those of both the father and the mother, emerge when the offspring is formed as one sex.,Alternatively, when a dyer puts herbs in a cauldron leyora, they all emerge as one color of dye, whereas the Holy One, Blessed be He, forms the fetus in a woman’s womb, and each and every one of the seeds emerges as its own type. In other words, the seed of the father form distinct elements, such as the white of the eye, and the seed of the mother forms other elements, such as the black of the eye, as explained above.,Rav Yosef taught: What is the meaning of that which is written: “And on that day you shall say: I will give thanks to You, Lord, for You were angry with me; Your anger is turned away, and You comfort me” (Isaiah 12:1)? With regard to what matter is the verse speaking?,It is referring, for example, to two people who left their homes to go on a business trip. A thorn penetrated the body of one of them, and he was consequently unable to go with his colleague. He started blaspheming and cursing in frustration. After a period of time, he heard that the ship of the other person had sunk in the sea, and realized that the thorn had saved him from death. He then started thanking God and praising Him for his delivery due to the slight pain caused to him by the thorn. This is the meaning of the statement: I will give thanks to You, Lord, for You were angry with me. Therefore, it is stated at the end of the verse: “Your anger is turned away, and You comfort me.”,And this statement is identical to that which Rabbi Elazar said: What is the meaning of that which is written: “Blessed be the Lord God, the God of Israel, Who does wondrous things alone; and blessed be His glorious name forever” (Psalms 72:18–19)? What does it mean that God “does wondrous things alone”? It means that even the one for whom the miracle was performed does not recognize the miracle that was performed for him.,Rabbi Ḥanina bar Pappa taught: What is the meaning of that which is written: “You measure zerita my going about orḥi and my lying down riv’i, and are acquainted with all my ways” (Psalms 139:3)? This verse teaches that a person is not created from the entire drop of semen, but from its clear part. Zerita can mean to winnow, while orḥi and riv’i can both be explained as references to sexual intercourse. Therefore the verse is interpreted homiletically as saying that God separates the procreative part of the semen from the rest. The school of Rabbi Yishmael taught a parable: This matter is comparable to a person who winnows grain in the granary; he takes the food and leaves the waste.,This is in accordance with a statement of Rabbi Abbahu, as Rabbi Abbahu raises a contradiction: It is written in one of King David’s psalms: “For You have girded me vatazreni with strength for battle” (II\xa0Samuel 22:40), without the letter alef in vatazreni; and it is written in another psalm: “Who girds me hame’azreni with strength” (Psalms 18:33), with an alef in hame’azreini. What is the difference between these two expressions? David said before the Holy One, Blessed be He: Master of the Universe, You selected me zeiritani, i.e., You separated between the procreative part and the rest of the semen in order to create me, and You have girded me zeraztani with strength.,Rabbi Abbahu taught: What is the meaning of that which is written in Balaam’s blessing: “Who has counted the dust of Jacob, or numbered the stock rova of Israel” (Numbers 23:10)? The verse teaches that the Holy One, Blessed be He, sits and counts the times that the Jewish people engage in intercourse revi’iyyoteihem, anticipating the time when the drop from which the righteous person will be created will arrive.,And it was due to this matter that the eye of wicked Balaam went blind. He said: Should God, who is pure and holy, and whose ministers are pure and holy, peek at this matter? Immediately his eye was blinded as a divine punishment, as it is written: “The saying of the man whose eye is shut” (Numbers 24:3).,And this statement is the same as that which Rabbi Yoḥa said: What is the meaning of that which is written, with regard to Leah’s conceiving Issachar: “And he lay with her that night” (Genesis 30:16)? The verse teaches that the Holy One, Blessed be He, contributed to that act. The manner in which God contributed to this act is derived from another verse, as it is stated: “Issachar is a large-boned garem donkey” (Genesis 49:14). This teaches that God directed Jacob’s donkey toward Leah’s tent so that he would engage in intercourse with her, thereby causing garam Leah’s conceiving Issachar.Rabbi Yitzḥak says that Rabbi Ami says: The sex of a fetus is determined at the moment of conception. If the woman emits seed first, she gives birth to a male, and if the man emits seed first, she gives birth to a female, as it is stated: “If a woman bears seed and gives birth to a male” (Leviticus 12:2).,The Sages taught: At first, people would say that if the woman emits seed first she gives birth to a male, and if the man emits seed first, she gives birth to a female. But the Sages did not explain from which verse this matter is derived, until Rabbi Tzadok came and explained that it is derived from the following verse: “These are the sons of Leah, whom she bore to Jacob in Paddan Aram, with his daughter Dinah” (Genesis 46:15). From the fact that the verse attributes the males to the females, as the males are called: The sons of Leah, and it attributes the females to the males,in that Dinah is called: His daughter, it is derived that if the woman emits seed first she gives birth to a male, whereas if the man emits seed first, she bears a female.,This statement is also derived from the following verse: “And the sons of Ulam were mighty men of valor, archers, and had many sons and sons’ sons” (I\xa0Chronicles 8:40). Is it in a person’s power to have many sons and sons’ sons? Rather, because''. None



Please note: the results are produced through a computerized process which may frequently lead to errors, both in incorrect tagging and in other issues. Please use with caution.
Due to load times, full text fetching is currently attempted for validated results only.
Full texts for Hebrew Bible and rabbinic texts is kindly supplied by Sefaria; for Greek and Latin texts, by Perseus Scaife, for the Quran, by Tanzil.net

For a list of book indices included, see here.